California Energy Network reliability in the budget delay – naturalnews.com

• The new country’s budget of $ 321 billion reduces $ 18 million from reliability of the network, postponing critical energy investments.
• The side network support for the order (DSGS) and the assets of the distributed electric backup (DEBA) face uncertainty in financing amid heat waves.
• Clean energy advocates warn of delays that threaten the stability of the network, the adoption of renewable energy and climate goals.
• The news governor attributes the budget deficiency to federal policies, including customs tariffs and market fluctuations.
• Financing of clean transport and school buses has been postponed, and it risks jobs and improving air quality.

In a decision calling for reckless critics, California state budget approved by Governor Gavin NewsCutting the main financing amid the aggravation of the energy deficiency that is moved by the heat. With the strain of solar energy and wind energy strained during the harsh weather, the budget of $ 321 billion in emergency support programs from network support programs reduced, with the largest greenhouse gas reduction fund and climate bond investments later this year. Defenders warn that this delay may exacerbate energy instability, which undermines both environmental goals and public safety, as the state faces increasingly fierce heat waves.

Delay in financing highlights tensions between green and reliable ambition

The budget reduces financing for two programs of decisive network: the network support aspect (DSGS) and the DEBA electrical backup assets, which provide emergency energy and decentralized energy storage during retinal emergencies. It is already scheduled to obtain $ 473 million until 2028, programs were reduced to $ 50 million in May before losing $ 18 million in the final budget. The Legislative Authority and the Newsom office instead of decisions on the state’s greenhouse gas release boxes and $ 4.9 billion in climate bonds, indicating the inequality.

Edson Perez, California at Advanced Energy United (AEU), criticized this step as “a bad timing of the stability of the network.” “Reliability programs like DSGs have achieved results … … California cannot continue to postpone,” he said, noting that the programs help maintain the spotlight on “clean energy” during the harsh weather. AEU described the postponed investments as “gambling with the safety of the public and the economic future.” similar The mistakes caused the financing caused the power outage during the 2020 heat waves, with critics, then blame for exaggerating the sources of renewable energy. Like solar energy, which stumbles during cloudy or hot nights.

Kate Unger of the California Solar and Storage Association warned that the cuts will deter participation in the program, describing the lack of clarity “a problem”. “These programs must grow,” she emphasized, noting the high risk of heat. Meanwhile, the budget allocated only $ 132 million to electric motor incentives, much lower than $ 1.5 billion required annually to achieve zero emissions.

Green energy conflicts in California

Current in California Network instability Echoes of previous policy errors. The aggressive renewable energy management of the state-which targets carbon-free electricity is 100 % by 2045-the network management, which requires complementary energy sources (such as natural gas) during the wager of the wind or sunlight. In 2020, these gaps caused power outages to blame insufficient “elasticity of the network”, calling for reliability. However, this batch faced the rush of cautious environmental groups from the effects of the fossil fuel climate.

Now, even newsom recognizes the operational restrictions of Green Energy: During failure in the Pacific and Electricity in the Pacific Ocean of 2022, he admitted solar and wind systems only “not working” during long cloudy periods. However, the new budget risks deepening this challenge by expanding the scope of storage financing and resources distributed.

Political accountability: Newsom blames Washington, and the preachers are asking

Governor Newsom attributes California financial strain to President Trump’s policies, including identification fluctuations to imported materials needed for renewable voltage and vehicle production. His office did not address direct questions about the network financing, but he frame the state budget restrictions as it intertwines with the federal inaction.

However, critics argue that California leaders are blaming. Perez said: “These cuts send a shift signal forever Supports 60,000 jobs. “Investments in electricity are not optional – they are essential to reduce emissions and protect workers.” The advocates of environmental justice added that delaying clean transport funds will harm low -income societies that suffer from both pollution and unreliable power.

The urge grows with summer heating

With high summer temperatures and net pressure, California stands at a crossroads. Delaying the financing of DSGS and Deba and clean transportation programs may mean a long power outage and high emissions from Adoption of emergency fossil fuels He lost economic opportunities in creating local energy.

Goovernor Newsom until late 2025 has to solve climate financing, but the watch beats. Perez also said: “You must decide California – Will it lead to clean, reliable or reliable energy, or keep its people in the dark?”

Sources of this article include:

UTILITYDIVE.com

AdvancedERGYUNIED.ORG