- Locking for COVID-19 caused more harm than good, studies showing devastating impacts on mental health, education and the economy.
- Censored media and technological platforms and laughs at locking criticism.
- Research reveals that locks were ten times dady than the virus itself, measured by years of lost life due to collateral damage.
- Confidence in public health establishments has been eroded due to the failure of the media to critically examine the locking policies in real time.
- The locking era highlights the dangers of uncontrolled government power and the need for responsibility to prevent future errors.
Five years after the Cavid-19 pandemic, the world has upset the world, the consumer media finally recognize what many conservatives and skeptical warned from the start: locking caused much more harm than good.
This late entry comes after years of implacable mockery, censorship and moving from those who dared to question the wisdom of extreme measures such as forced masking, school closures and business closings. Now, as studies reveal the devasting collateral damage to these policies, the delayed calculation of the media raises serious questions about its role in silencing dissent and Promote fear focused on fear.
Locking disaster: an expensive experience
In 2020, while the pandemic spread, governments around the world have implemented unprecedented locking to curb the virus. These measures were justified by “experts” like Dr Anthony Fauci and political leaders who warned against a “dark winter” if the Americans did not comply. However, five years later, the data tells a different story. A revolutionary study commissioned by Revolver News have found that locks were ten times as fatal than the virus itself, measured in terms of lost years of life due to economic devastation, mental health crises and social isolation.
The results of the study have since been taken up by a Correction of growing research. School closings have led to catastrophic learning losses, students are always half aist in mathematics and reading. Mental health crises, especially in young people, have skyrocketed, with anxiety, depression and suicide rates reaching alarming levels. Small businesses have been closed, the livelihoods have been destroyed and social ties to the weight of prolonged isolation.
The role of the media in the suppression of the truth
What is most exasperating is how the media treated those who raised concerns about locking. The conservatives, scientists and everyday citizens who questioned the effectiveness of these measures have been described as “conspiracy theorists”, censored on social networks, and even displaced. Figures like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who co-wrote Great Barrington’s statement opposing locking, has faced vicious reactions and death threats. Facebook and Twitter have silenced dissident voices, while public health officials such as Dr Fauci and Dr Francis Collins have rejected alternative and dangerous views.
Now, the same media that have once defended locking carefully admit their failures. THE Boston Globe Recently published an article wondering if the locking compromises were worth it, citing studies which show that policies did not do much to slow down the virus while inflicting immense collateral damage. Even some former locking supporters, such as the mayor of Cambridge, Sumbul Siddiqui, now express doubts about the decisions taken in 2020.
The locking era showed us the dangers of uncontrolled government power And the complicity of the media to amplify fear. The inability of the media to critically examine these policies in real time has had lasting consequences. Confidence in public health establishments has been eroded and the public is now more skeptical about “expert” advice than ever before. Like Dr. Michael Osterholm, an expert in infectious diseases, admitted it: “Locking has never been really effective, and the confusion that surrounds them sowed a lot of public distrust for the government.”
The locking debacle serves as a story on the dangers of sacrificing freedom for the illusion of security. Delayed admission of the failure media is a cold comfort for the millions of people who have suffered under these policies. What is necessary now is responsibility, not only for politicians and public health officials who have pushed these measures, but for the media who have silenced dissent and spread fear.
While we are faced with the possibility of future pandemicsWe have to remember the lessons of COVID-19: Authority of question, to reject propaganda and never let fear dictate politics. Locking was a catastrophic error, and the best way to make sure they no longer happen is to keep responsible for responsibility – and never forget the price we paid for their pride.
The sources of this article include:
(tagstranslate) Badhealth
๐ #MR_HEKA ๐
