In Washington’s debate on the promulgation of steep funding cuts in Medicaid, words are a central battlefield.
Many republican legislators and conservative policy leaders wishing to reduce the joint health program of the United States use a loaded language to describe it. Linguistic experts and defenders of Medicaid registrants say that their choice of words is misleading and aims to influence public opinion against the 60 -year -old popular government program in order to persuade the congress to reduce funding.
Republicans as Senator Bill Cassidy de LouisianaChairman of the Senatural Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, deploy provocative terms such as “money laundering“, Rebranding has decades – and legal – a practice known as provider taxes, which most states use to win additional medicadid funds.
They say it is “discrimination“The federal government corresponds to the financing of the State at a higher rate for adults covered by the expansion of Medicaid of the Act respecting affordable care than for other registrants, including children, pregnant women and people with disabilities.
And many Republicans, including the president of the Mike Johnson Chamber and the Director of the Management and Budget Office, Russell Vought, described the adults who acquired the coverage of Medicaid through the expansion of the ACA as “valid“While they are pressure for federal work requirements.
The term implies that they need less government help than other beneficiaries of Medicaid – even if some have health problems or care responsibilities that make job holding difficult.
“Valid adults without dependents are better off with jobs than with documents, as well as their American communities and taxpayers,” said senator John Kennedy (R-La.) in a press release in February.
Admittedly, political spin is an older practice than Washington, and the Democrats are not spectators in the War of Words. But what strikes the latest GOP’s efforts is that it focuses on reducing a health program for the poorest residents in the country, in part, for tax reductions for richer Americans.
A KFF survey carried out last month and Released on Friday noted that support for the modifications proposed to Medicaid can wax or decline according to what individuals are informed of the program.
For example, the survey has revealed that around 6 out of 10 adults support work requirements, the same part of respondents wrongly thinking that most working adults on Medicaid are unemployed. In fact, about two -thirds work.
The KFF survey has also shown that support for work requirements falls to around 3 out of 10 adults when those who initially supported them mean that most of Medicaid registrations are already working and that, if the requirements were implemented, many would risk losing coverage due to the burden of proving eligibility.
When respondents initially opposed the work requirements were informed that they could allow Medicaid to be reserved for groups such as the elderly, disabled and low -income children, their support increased to 77%.
Steven MintzA professor of history at the University of Texas, said that the Medicaid debate will probably be won not on the facts, but rather on which the party can describe it in terms which earn the most public support. “Words are exercised as weapons,” he said.
The choices of the words of the Republicans are designed to appeal to the prejudices of people on Medicaid, he said, adding that the “loaded” terms help to divert attention from a detailed political discussion.
“Words help strengthen a position to which people are already looking at,” he said.
Sara RosenbaumProfessor emeritus of law and health policies at George Washington University, said conservatives who have long tried to shrink Medicaid have an obvious motivation.
“These people spend their lives trying to ruin the program by seeking the last slogans, the latest jokes and the new absurd nicknames which, according to them, will persuade the congress to completely upset the program and to withdraw the advantages of tens of millions of people,” she said.
Medicaid and the health insurance program for closely linked children cover nearly 80 million low -income and disabled people – approximately 1 in 5 Americans. Registrations and expenses have skyrocketed in the last decade due to the large part of the cocovid pandemic and the decision of more states to extend Medicaid under the ACA. The survey shows that the program is almost as popular as Medicare, the health program mainly for the 65 years or over – with around 3 in 4 in 4 hold a favorable opinion of Medicaid.
The budgetary resolution of the House of Representatives, a plan that narrowly adopted on February 25 without democratic support, calls for cuts of at least $ 880 billion over a decade largely of federal health and energy programs. A separate resolution of the Senate without cups of such – so far – is also at stake. Any proposal should pass the two rooms.
Democrats fear that most of these cuts come from Medicaid. Trump promised not to touch medication, leaving little or no alternatives. He said that he would “cherish” Medicaid and only continue waste, fraud and abuse in the program without offering details on how it would be interpreted – and he approved the plan of the house calling for cuts.
States and the federal government share the funding of Medicaid, the paying federal government From 50% to 77% the cost of providing services to most beneficiaries. The rate is 90% for beneficiaries receiving coverage through the Medicaid expansion program by their state.
The rate of federal consideration varies depending on the per capita income of a state compared to the national average; States with lower per capita income have higher correspondence rates. The remaining share of the financing of the program comes from state and local sources.
The words “discrimination” and “money laundering” were used in the reports of the Paragon Health Institute, a conservative reflection group led by a former Trump advisor, Brian Blas. Two former paragon leaders now advise Trump, and a former paragon analyst advises Johnson.
Blase said that there was no subsequent reason in the group’s words. “We are trying to describe the problem in a way that is most logical for congresses and decision-makers,” he said.
Paragon analysts have argued to put an end to the “discrimination” of the federal government in state dollars for those who are covered by the expansion of ACA in Medicaid at a higher rate than for other registrants. They also propose to give states a fixed amount of federal money per year for the program, rather than the open federal funds which have always been a characteristic of Medicaid.
The unique states collect funds for their care of Medicaid Supplier taxes Whether hospitals or nursing homes pay. States often reimburse service providers through additional federal money.
Blase acknowledges that the taxes of providers used by states to reduce more federal money – than Paragon called “money laundering” – are legal. He said that the call for practice is misleading because providers benefit financially.
“Silver money laundering is the best term which we can think of for the diets and states caused to obtain a federal reimbursement for artificial expenses that benefit states and suppliers,” he said.
Joan AlkerExecutive director of the Center for Children and Families of the University of Georgetown, defended the taxes of service providers as well as legal states which collect funds to cover low -income people. She noted most states with providers’ taxes are checked At least in part by the Republicans.
Alker rejected the concept that improved funding to extend registration is “discrimination”. ACA included higher rates to cover more low-income registered, as it was the only way for the United States to allow it, she said.
Without providing a specific example, Blase said the defenders said the cuts “let people die on the streets.”
During a brief freezing of funding to Medicaid suppliers in January, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the best democrat of the Senate financing committee, said: “This is a blatant attempt to tear health insurance from millions of Americans overnight and will kill people.”
Kff Health News is a national editorial hall that produces in -depth journalism on health problems and is one of the main KFF operating programs – an independent source of research, survey and independent journalism. Learn more about Kff.
Use our contents
This story can be republished for free (details).
