Zelensky rejects the Trump exchange suggestion as Putin requires Ukrainian withdrawal – NaturalNews.com

• Ukrainian President Zelinski rejects the proposed “land swap” of Trump with Russia, declaring the non -negotiable Ukraine sovereignty.
• Zelensky Putin is accused of of using a deceptive ceasefire to legitimize Russia’s occupation of Ukrainian lands, including Crimea and Eastern regions.
• Russia is calling for withdrawing from Ukraine from the attached lands, while Ukraine refuses to waive any land, and to fram the war as an existential struggle.
• US financing for Ukraine faces audit amid corruption reports, while Russia supports its war effort through BackChannel offers with China and Iran.
• Alaska’s planned summit with Putin risked the marginalization of Ukraine, which sparked anger in Europe and fears of an unsuccessful peace agreement.

Ukrainian President Folodimir Zelinski categorically rejected that US President Donald Trump’s proposal to suspend the peaceful “land barter” peace with Russia, which pledges that the sovereignty of Ukraine is still not negotiable.

In a fiery video speech, Zelinski accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of seeking legitimacy of the occupation of Ukrainian lands through a deceptive ceasefire. The war, which was now in its third year, does not appear, any signs of ending, with the consolidation of both sides in their demands: Ukraine refuses to waive the Crimea, Jacon, Zapurozhi, Logansk or Donetsk, while Russia insists on full withdrawal from these areas. Meanwhile, American taxpayers continue to develop the bill due to an immersed conflict in corruption and geopolitical immunization.

Zelensky position on which it is unable

Zelinski reprimand It came shortly after Trump launch the idea of regional exchange as part of a possible peace agreement. “Now Putin wants to forgive to seize the south of our Jacon, Zaporozhye, the entire Logansk area, the Donetsk region, and the Crimea is the Crimea,” Zelesky announced. “We will not allow Russia to make this second attempt to divide Ukraine.” His statements to Kyiv’s constant situation confirm that any concessions will reward the Russian aggression.

Trump suggested that resolution It can include “some land exchange, to improve both of them”, a proposal that Zelinski refused immediately. He said: “The Ukrainians will not give their lands to the occupier,” and it frames the conflict as an existential struggle against imperial expansion. The challenge of the Ukrainian leader reflects broader concerns that Western powers, exhausting the long war, may pressure Kiev to unfavorable concessions.

Russia’s maximum demands

Meanwhile, Moscow has doubled its regional claims. After the referendums that were widely rejected as illegal by the West, Russia held the Crimea in 2014 and four additional areas in 2022. Ukraine maintains partial control over some areas, Russian forces recently seized the border regions in Kharkov and Sumi. Kremlin officials have repeatedly called for the full Ukrainian withdrawal from these regions as a pre -peace condition.

Putin’s circumstances include Ukraine, the surrender of Donbas, the industrial Hartand, which includes Donetsk and Luhansk, in exchange for a ceasefire. Ukrainian officials have particularly recognized the capacity to restore missing lands militarily, but publicly, the Zelinski administration refuses to entertain these concessions. He warned, “Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace.”

High cost of war and corruption

As the stalemate continues, the financial and humanitarian outcome escalates. The United States poured billions of dollars in Ukraine’s defense, with a little accountability for how to spend this money. Corruption reports within the Ukraine government, including the scandals of embezzlement and enlarged military purchases, have sparked eyebrows between American legislators. Meanwhile, the war machine in Russia, despite being beaten by sanctions, continues to take advantage of Backchannel deals with countries like China and Iran.

The conflict has also been strained by the Atlantic relations. European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, insist that the fate of Ukraine “cannot be determined without the Ukrainians” and not without Europe, given its security shares. However, Trump’s unilateral batch of direct conversations with Putin, which excludes Zelinski from initial discussions angered in Kiev and Brussels. The proposed Alaska summit, which was identified on August 15, risks the entire Ukrainian interests.

A peace or geopolitical trap?

Trump’s approach has extracted criticism from both hawks and doves. His proposal to get to know the Russian allegations of the Crimea and the occupied territories have sparked the concern of the Ukrainian allies, while his frustration with Putin’s category hints to the diminishing patience. “He is very complicated,” Trump admitted. “We’ll get some, we will get some switch.” But Zelensky’s refusal to bargain indicates that any mediation deal without the approval of Kyiv will collapse.

Alaska’s summit, if it continues, can mark a pivotal moment … or any other impasse. Putin, Uri Oshakov’s assistant, launched a chance to “discuss the options for achieving a long -term peaceful decision,” but warned that the process would be “difficult”. With Ukraine excluded from the table, the result may be only Deepening divisions.

Sources of this article include:

RT.com

nytimes.com

Telegraph.co.uk