Thinking about thinking Psychology today

I used to know the phone numbers of my friends and family by heart (I still know my number childhood house). Now I barely remember my own number, because all I have to do is click on a button on the screen.

The same for the roads. I used to know when the traffic was bad in certain areas, I knew shortcuts throughout the city, and I had a mental map in my neighborhood and my city. I no longer know any of this, because all I have to do is put a destination in Google Maps and follow the instructions.

This is not a bad thing! In fact, I would like to claim that it is often positive. The shortcuts have been freed mental space for more important things. Why do you care about remembering my brother’s phone number when technology can do work for me?

Now, in one way, Amnesty International Similar: It is also an abbreviation that can free the mental space of other things. But there is also something decisively different from artificial intelligence. We need to understand this difference if we want to use artificial intelligence in ways that help us with prosperity.

From GPS to AI

The progress from GPS to AI is a fundamental shift. To be briefly placed as possible: Amnesty International does a lot of our thinking for us more than GPS at all.

When we ask artificial intelligence to help write emails, and do not correct grammatical rules, it constitutes our accent, arguments and thoughts. We ask him to analyze work situations, and provides explanations and recommendations that affect how to see the problems themselves.

The result: We are not only getting answers faster; We think less if these answers are logical. We use external sources not only storing raw materials that feed on the perception, but perception itself.

Again, this is not necessarily a bad thing. We use external sources of sports operations to calculators and data tables, and this enables us to achieve a lot through our cognitive resources. So the point here is not that we must completely stop the use of external sources of our thinking.

Instead, the important point is that thinking about thinking becomes very important. If we will get Amnesty International to do a lot of our thinking for us, it will be important to be able to assess the money for thinking that we use external sources.

Amnesty International requires cognitive skills

This is often called Beyond knowledgeand The ability to think about your thinking. Usually, this indicates thinking about your mental processes. But if you are going to use in artificial intelligence to do some of your thinking for you, beyond knowledge should be expanded to think about artificial intelligence also.

For example, think about two people asking for artificial intelligence Professional life advice. The first accepts everything that artificial intelligence suggests, while the second treats suggestions as starting points, she asks: What are the assumptions that depend on? How do you match the actual values? What might be missing? It is so clear that anyone will get better results over time.

The person who asks AI and critically evaluates his thinking – and his thinking regarding the use of artificial intelligence – a major component of literacy Amnesty International: Awareness beyond cognitive awareness to assess the responses of artificial intelligence.

For example, a good, skilled doctor does not accept the use of artificial intelligence suggestions for diagnosing artificial intelligence In Toto; She knows the parts she accepts, and she knows why she accepts it, and she knows where she needs more. From Al -Maqasa, the businessman may use artificial intelligence to develop a business strategy, but it continuously complements, refining. Sometimes it refuses, artificial intelligence suggestions based on their experience and vision.

These experts succeed specifically because they bring beyond cognitive skills to interact. They know what they know, what they do not know, and what Amnesty International is likely to mistake. Instead of using artificial intelligence as an alternative to thinking, they use artificial intelligence to complete and enhance their thinking.

Four practices to enhance beyond knowledge

Building a mobilized cognitive awareness requires deliberate practice. Here are four habits to help you develop behind knowledge about both your thinking and think about using external sources to artificial intelligence:

1. Check the sources: Before accepting any answer, ask: How this system knows what to know? and: Can you support her?

2. Questions Assumptions: Select one belief you kept without interrogation, then ask if the evidence actually supported him and to what extent.

3. Show your work: When working through complex problems, make your logic outright: I assume x because Y, but it may be wrong in Z. This helps to make your thinking visible to yourself.

4. The gap’s mind: Activistly search for what is missing from any answer. What are the views that are not represented? What will a person indicate?

The agency’s confirmation of our thinking process

The goal is to swear more artificial intelligence than to get rid of smartphones or delete Google Maps. But just as some people walk from time to time instead of driving – not because cars are evil, but because the movement keeps different potential alive – we can choose the time to think about artificial help. And when you think without it.

Sometimes, for example, instead of rushing to artificial intelligence for an answer, it is useful to simply sit with an hour question. Or, to take another example, it is sometimes better to determine an answer to yourself, although artificial intelligence can do so faster, because doing this will help you develop skills that will benefit you in the long run.

The most sophisticated users of artificial intelligence are not those who hold everything except those who are deliberately over what they are. This requires saying no to some amenities. But what you get in return is to maintain your most human capabilities: curiosity, differences, and the ability to sit with complexity until a real look appears.

A simple practice to consult what you can start using today

Once a day, when you receive an answer from Amnesty International, stop and ask yourself: If this is a mistake, how do I know?

Do not ask this question because you expect the answer to be wrong. You ask her to continue to check: Do I use the device to think better, or are I simply letting the device do all my thinking for me?