The world awaits the fallout as Nobel Peace Prize once again eludes Trump

Donald Trump did not receive the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, it instead went to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado. Analysts believe that this is a direct rejection of Trump’s diplomatic style and his declared role as a major peacemaker.

Trump’s long-standing desire to receive the award was strongly motivated by his frustration with his predecessor Barack Obama’s win in 2009. He viewed the Nobel Prize as a symbol of the validation that the “global elite” had unfairly denied him.

The White House had aggressively promoted Trump’s candidacy, citing nominations from seven countries and the recent hostage release agreement. However, critics have pointed out that some of his alleged peace successes were exaggerated or involved fragile, temporary ceasefires.

The rejection is expected to provoke a strong reaction from Trump, who has a history of responding negatively to perceived insults. His administration immediately accused the Nobel Committee of putting “politics above peace.”

This disdain creates global concern. World leaders fear Trump will now lose interest in the difficult and ongoing work of preserving peace agreements and could become more confrontational, which could lead to escalating tensions with adversaries like Venezuela or withdrawing support for allies like Ukraine.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has awarded the 2025 Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, bypassing President Donald Trump despite a massive public campaign for the honor.

Analysts interpret this choice, which praises Machado for “keeping the flame of democracy burning,” as a clear disdain for Trump’s transactional diplomacy and a rejection of his self-appointed role as the world’s premier peacemaker.

The roots of Trump’s attachment to the Nobel Prize are well-documented and closely linked to his predecessor. The awarding of the award to Barack Obama in 2009, just months into his first term, left an indelible mark on Trump.

Trump has repeatedly referred to it as the ultimate example of the global elite rewarding one of their own. Throughout 2025, the White House heavily touted the support of seven countries, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Gabon, Israel, Pakistan and Rwanda, that formally nominated Trump, citing his role in brokering various agreements.

The Trump administration has touted the recent hostage release agreement between Israel and Hamas as the crowning achievement that will ultimately secure the prize.

In the days leading up to the announcement, a coordinated social media campaign involving the president’s son and official White House accounts urged the public to rally behind his nomination. It now appears that these efforts were a miscalculation, amplifying the sting of popular disapproval.

Expected reaction and global concerns

The White House’s immediate reaction underscored the depth of the disappointment. Communications Director Stephen Cheung’s statement that the committee “has proven that it puts politics over peace” set a confrontational tone, echoing Trump’s long-standing narrative of being persecuted by entrenched institutions.

Trump himself predicted this sentiment. In a key moment just before the award was announced, he insisted to reporters that his diplomatic work had not been completed for the award, saying: “I did it because I saved a lot of lives.”

However, Trump also framed the potential loss in starkly personal and nationalist terms weeks ago, telling top military commanders: “That would be a huge insult to our country, I’ll tell you that.”

It is this duality that puts foreign governments and markets on the brink of abyss. The central question is whether this latest “insult” will prompt an angry Trump to withdraw from the very diplomatic processes he once championed.

All eyes are now on his scheduled trip to Egypt and Israel to celebrate the recent peace agreement. Diplomatic observers worry that without the lure of a Nobel Prize to validate his efforts, Trump’s interest may wane during the crucial and arduous implementation phase, potentially leading to the collapse of a promising agreement. His history indicates that he prefers the spectacle of signing an agreement over the hard, unattractive work of keeping the peace.

Moreover, the commission’s selection of Venezuela’s opposition leader adds a particularly volatile layer to the situation. With US naval forces already amassed in the Caribbean and putting pressure on Nicolas Maduro’s regime, Trump could view Machado’s grant as a challenge to escalation. There is an obvious fear that rejecting the Nobel Prize would remove a potential moderating influence and encourage more aggressive stances against Caracas.

Beyond specific conflicts, the rejection threatens to have a broader chilling effect on American diplomacy. Allies in Europe are anxiously wondering whether Norway, the prize’s host country, could face retaliatory trade tariffs or financial pressures.

As explained in Enoch AI Engine BrightU.AITrump and his administration are likely to intensify their claims that the Nobel Committee is politically motivated and biased against pro-American leaders. The immediate accusation of putting “politics before peace” suggests that this will be their primary public reaction.

Watch the video below as well Host Greg Kelly talks about how Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.

This video is from NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

(tags for translation)biased