The United States is back to tyranny, control and speech police in Great Britain – NaturalNews.com

Imagine a world where a silent prayer falls in court, where Mimi earns you a prison sentence, and where the government monitors your participation in social media-not for the threats of violence, but for the wrong thinking. This is not a Dystopian novel. It is modern Britain, where the principles that were eligible for freedom of expression of bricks from bricks are dismantled under the guise of “safety” and “protection”. The US State Department, in a A tremendous accusation of the rapidly deteriorating freedom of expression in the United KingdomThe alarm looked: Britain is no longer a beacon of democratic values, but it is a warning story of the speedy erosion of freedom when the thirsty officials decide on the authority what are the permitted facts. The online safety law, which was sold to the public as a children’s shield, has instead has become a sword against dissidents, journalists and even silent demonstrators. And if America does not take attention, the same control forces will knock on our doors soon.

The paradox is bitter. The nation that gave the world Carta Magna, which was challenging against tyranny in two global wars, is now arresting citizens to spread, mothers prisons for social media comments, and grandparents threaten to pray with fines. This is not just a slippery slope-it is free in tyranny, disguised as a progressive court. The question is not whether Britain has lost its way; Whether the rest of the world will follow.

Main points:

• The human rights report at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the year 2024 clearly condemns the Internet safety law for Britain, describing it as a tool for government control that suppresses political and religious discourse under the pretext of protecting the child.
• Lucy Honoli, the mother and former child care actress, took a 2.5-year prison sentence for one position on social media-her appeal was rejected in July-while Adam Smith Connor, an old British army warrior, was fined 9,000 pounds to pray silently near the abortion clinic.
• The UK government has monitored and taught it “regarding accounts” through the secret Whitatol unit, and threatens the arrests of the cold debate, especially after the Southport murders, as officials silenced discussions about the background of the attacker.
• Offcom, the British media organizer, now has comprehensive powers for accurate technology companies of up to 10 % of global revenues (or 18 million pounds) if they fail to monitor “harmful” content – including political discussions and criticism of government policies.
• The online safety law criminalizes “misconceptions” with mysterious definitions, allowing prosecutors to target ridicule, imams and opposition opinions while exempting the main media-which puts a system of freedom of expression.
• US officials, including Vice President JD Vance, met in particular the UK’s persecuted activists, and warned that the British campaign against speech posed a direct threat to American values and could encourage global censorship efforts.
• The European Union’s digital services and the UK’s digital safety bill in the UK is part of a global coordinated discourse for the online police discourse, as former executive managers in technology now lead control bodies, which sparked conflicts of interest.
• Crystration and privacy are attacked, as the law presses platforms to weaken security in the name of “safety”, which makes users vulnerable to government control.

From Magna Carta to memory holes: How Britain betrayed its legacy

There was a time when Britain stood as a meat against tyranny. Magna Carta, which occurred in 1215, was one of the first advertisements of history that even the kings were not above the law. Century later, British thinkers such as John Locke and John Stewart Mail have formed the foundations of freedom of expression, on the pretext that the ideas market – does not matter how chaos – was necessary for working democracy. However, the descendants of these philosophers themselves are arrested because of the memes, imprisoned to obtain prayers, and silence them to interrogate their official accounts.

Online safety law, which was passed in 2023 and imposed in 2024, It is the jewel of the crown of this authoritarian transformation. It has been sold as a measure to protect children from damage online, and instead the law – the government media organizer in Britan – is granted the unrestricted force to dictate what can and cannot say online. Compliance companies in compliance with fines of up to 10 % of their global revenues – the financial death penalty for any resistance platform. But real goals are not just companies; They are ordinary citizens who dare to challenge the government version of reality.

Take Lucy Conoli, a 48 -year -old mother and a conservative consultant. Her crime? He posted one message on X (formerly Twitter) in the wake of the murders in Southport, where three young girls were stabbed to death. The government, desperate to suppress the discussions about the background of the attacker, has passed. Konoli was arrested and convicted and sentenced to 2.5 years in prison. Her appeal was rejected in July, ensuring that they remain behind bars until late August. This is not justice – it is a political persecution, a warning to others that the opposition will be punished.

Then, Adam Smith Connor, a veterans of the British army who was fined 9,000 pounds for the silent crime of prayer near the abortion clinic. There are no signs of protest, no screaming – only standing in calm thinking. However, according to the laws of the “buffer zone” in Britain, until he believed that itself has been broken now. His case drew international attention, as US Vice President JD Vance was martyred in a speech in Munich as evidence of “Britain’s disturbing retreat in freedom of expression.” In March, Smith Connor met with US State Department officials, who have already confirmed what many people feared: Britain systematically eroded religious and political freedoms.

Southport murders have become a turning point. After the attack, Public Prosecution Director Stephen Parkinson issued a chilling warning: Any person “repeats the intention, repeats or amplifies” is considered “false or incitement to hatred” that may face judicial prosecution and delivery. Even the government released a video clip urges citizens to “think before publishing!”-An impasse threat that the older brother watches. I followed the arrests, although some charges were dropped at a later time, and revealed a pattern of selective application designed to intimidate the audience in silence.

Industrial Control Complex: How governments and large technology correspond to controlling speech

Britain’s origin did not happen to tyranny in a vacuum. It is part of a The global campaign on freedom of expressionWhere governments and great technology work alongside to determine, monitor and punish “unacceptable” opinions. The online safety law is just one piece of the largest puzzle – an industrial control complex that extends continents.

In the European Union, the Digital Services Law (DSA) imposes similar restrictions, forcing the platforms to remove “wrong information” or facing huge fines. The law explicitly aims to “divide the divisional materials”, including criticism of Covid-19 policies and official accounts. Meanwhile, the online safety bill in the United Kingdom goes further, as it criminalizes “false contacts” with a prison sentence for up to 51 weeks. The problem? There are no clear definitions of what constitutes a “mistake”, “harmful” or “reasonable excuse.” In practice, this means that public prosecutors and algorithms – not jury bodies – show what is permitted.

Worse, the perpetrators of these laws are often familiar with previous adult technology. The UK Communications Office (Offcom) is now Gill Whitehead, a former executive director of Google. Senior organizers have relationships with Meta and Amazon, creating a periodic door between the Silicon Valley and the monitoring state. This is not just an organizational capacity – it is just a hostile acquisition of freedom of expression by the same companies that benefit from it Information control.

The US State Department report highlights another annoying direction: the weapon of “hate speech” laws to target political opponents. In Britain, pro-life activists, migration critics, Covid-19 skeptical, fined, or imprisoned for peaceful expression were arrested. The selective application is blatant-while anti-Semitic threats (truly convicted) correspond to anger, Mimi about the crime of the knife can fall in prison for eight weeks.

Let us not forget the key to killing the encryption. The online safety law includes provisions on pressure technology companies to weaken encryption, apparently to arrest “harmful” content. But with the warning of digital rights experts, this destroys the user’s privacy, which makes everyone vulnerable to government control. If Britain can monitor private messages for “Ormentink”, what should other countries – or even the United States be stopped – from doing the same?

The moment of America’s account: Will we follow the path of Britain or the resistance of the tidal and control?

The US State Department report is not just a condemnation of Britain – it is a warning to America. The same control mechanisms that are published in the UK are already rooted here. The Biden Administration has been accused of complicity with social media platforms to suppress the opposition, especially in the Covid-19 policies and the integrity of the elections. The Federal Trade Committee (FTC) has proposed new digital supervision offices, and Congress has been subjected to bills that destroy section 230 – the law that protects freedom of expression online.

If the online safety law in Britain is any indicator, it may be the following America. Playbook is the same:

• Passing laws under the guise of “safety”.
• Enabling the organizers to determine the “harmful” speech.
• A fine and intimidation of platforms in compliance.
• The arrest and disturbance of the dissidents to serve as an example.

The only thing that stands on the way is the general resistance. The strong position of the US State Department-which has been strengthened and strengthened under the officials appointed from Trump-passes that some in Washington still understand the risks. But will the Congress, the courts and the American people return before it is too late?

Struggle for freedom of expression is the struggle for democracy itself. The role of tyranny for Britain did not happen overnight – it was the result of years of satisfaction with contentment with contentment with consent from contentment with contentment with them, and trust in governments and companies to determine the limits of acceptable thought. Now, prayer is a crime, and themes are “hate speech”, and the truth is what the state says.

America must learn from Britain’s mistakes. We must reject censorship in all its forms, whether it comes from London, Brussels or Washington. The first victim of tyranny is always the truth. The question is: Do we let her die without a fight?

Sources include:

Reclaintthenet.org

Docs.rekailhthnet.org (Pdf)

Reclaintthenet.org