The UK government is funded by YouTube stars to form global novels – NaturalNews.com

• The UK government is secretly funded by international influencers on YouTube to enhance foreign policy messages under NDAS.
• Zinc, a London -based company, runs secret campaigns in 22 countries, including allegations of election intervention in Slovakia.
• The influencers are prevented from disclosing relations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the United Kingdom, which sparked accusations of modern propaganda.
• Tactics reflects misinformation strategies during the Cold War era, such as the Information Research Department.
• Legal experts highlight violations of advertising standards and democratic transparency.

A three -year paid investigation by the United Kingdom, which has been confidential, revealed a secret British government program that supports foreign -impacts of foreign YouTube to publish the European Agency’s foreign policy accounts. The operation, published by the Commonwealth and Foreign Development Office (FCDO) and which is run by the Zinc network close to London, operates on the 9.45 million pounds annually channel to amplify the content in 22 countries, including Belcik, Belqan and Slovakia. Campaign, which disguise as the base -level movements, claim “anti -information” and “strengthening democracy” but operate in a strict secrecy, with the presence of those who are required to sign NDAS and provide prior publishing reviews by UK officials.

Playbook book for zinc network: dedicated content and the messages that are controlled

Zinc Network, led by a strategic expert of the former Conservative Party, Scott BrownBBC Producer Robert Elliot, recruits “influential and well -effective” on platforms like YouTube and Facebook to Spread the content approved by the state. The company’s campaign for the year 2023 in Slovakia, for example, targeted young voters through anti -nationalist messages, and harmful support for the supporter SMER party led by Russia led by Robert Fico. A former unknown employee in the strategic zinc described it as “governmental propaganda”, claiming that the company’s work was directly electoral results.

SURSIFIED documents, leaked, reveals zinc that effectively sought from “unknown” influencers to maintain reasonable denial. FCDO’s supervision extends to the editing of guidelines, including “gender sensitivity” and “strategic alignment”, although officials refuse to reveal the details of taxpayers financing to protect “partners”. However, the lists of zinc jobs publicly recognize the intentions of “editing and narrative cooperation”, which contradicts the demands of liberation independence.

A moral and legal crossroads: NDAS, transparency and historical concerns

The program faces severe criticism of violating the rules of advertising in the UK, which requires the disclosure of paid promotional offers. In contrast, zinc videos, in contrast to that, obscures the care relationships to appear “authentic”, as influential people often do not realize their links to Whitehall. Even the Zinc GMB GMB union, a complaint, filed, claiming that the employees remained in the dark about their role in formulating government propaganda.

Critics highlight the strange similarities in the Information Research Department during the Cold War era (IRD), the secret FCDO unit that affected the period from 1947-1977 on the global media to undermine Soviet interests, often through journalists at risk. Historians argue that today’s tactics reflect the same logic: Hide geopolitical business schedules as “neutral” efforts for democracy.

Politics: Democracy in exchange for secret manipulation

Defending the initiative, Foreign Minister David Lami insists that it is necessary to face “Russian misinformation information”. Zinc claims that its campaigns offer Russian aggression, especially in the Ukrainian war, and insists that its work is in line with the local voices that oppose “extremist accounts”.

However, the effects of the program challenge democratic principles. When governments finance the content while suppressing transparency, they erod the public’s confidence – local and international. Former FCDO employees warn that secret campaigns risk normalizing the “misinformation” that the program claims to be fighting.

The risks of secret social manipulation

The UK’s dependence on hidden social media operations highlights a serious contradiction: in seeking to “defend democracy” by controlling global accounts, The government undermines transparency It is necessary for democracy itself. Like its predecessor in the Cold War, IRD tactics, today’s tactics give priority to strategic control over open discourse, and clarity lines between the impact of the government and the liberalization of expression. With the end of zinc contracts, policy makers must wrestle whether the cost of censorship is acceptable for the nation that aims to arrange the truth.

Sources of this article include:

RT.com

Seconaseduk.org