The Trump team collided with health policy with the “Maha Report”

The Trump administration recently issued a statement about the error of health in America, but many of its actions collide with its answers.

Scientists and public health advocates see a deep interruption between what the administration said about health – especially in “Maha report“That is, President Donald Trump Recently presented In the White House – and what is already doing.

For example, the report says more research is needed about chronic diseases and the cumulative effects of chemicals in the environment. But the collective cancellation of the Trump administration to grant federal research has deviated from studies on these topics.

The report condemns the industry -funded research on chemicals and health on a large scale and unreliable. But the administration seeks to reduce government financing that can serve as a balance.

“There are many contradictions between discourse and work,” said Alonso Blue, a chief science official at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a health -focused charitable company.

The report, which is the cornerstone of President Donald Trump, was released again, by a committee composed of the Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services Robert F. Kennedy Junior and other administration officials.

He soon became famous for him Footnote and Signs It was produced with the help of artificial intelligence. White House press secretary Caroline Levit described the problems as “coordination issues”, and the administration reviewed the report.

White House spokesperson and the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services did not respond to the questions of this article.

For a glimpse of the largest image, think about the state of Poipy diapers.

MAAA report says environmental chemicals may pose risk of children’s health – that the nation needs to “better understand the cumulative pregnancy of multiple exposure and how it can affect children’s health.”

The Environmental Protection Agency was thinking about the same lines in 2020 when it was He asked the scholars to suggest Ways to search for children’s exposure to chemicals from soil and dust. He said, for young children, eating particles – by placing their hands on the ground or the ground after that in their mouths – could be an important way to exposure to pollutants such as herbal pesticides and pesticides.

One of the scholarships went to a team of scientists at Jones Hopkins University and the University of California San Francisco. The researchers gained permission to collect samples from people’s homes, including dust and diapers.

However, besides a small test, they were unable to analyze urine and stool samples because the grant was terminated in the spring, said the study leader Keve Nachman, Professor of Environmental Health and Engineering at Johns Hopkins.

“The award goals are no longer consistent with the priorities of the Environmental Protection Agency,” the agency said in the termination notification on May 10.