The pioneering study displays the failure of the Environmental Protection Agency in protecting children from nitrate pollution

The pioneering study offers the failure of the Environmental Protection Agency to protect children from nitrate pollution

A new study in Plos Water It reveals that even the levels of trace nitrate (one percent of the maximum of 10 mg/liter of the Environmental Protection Agency) are linked to early births and children with weight loss, which contradicts the safety assurances for decades.

The Nitrate Nitrate Standard, which depends only on preventing “blue child syndrome”, ignores the risks of the fetus’s growth. Research has shown harm at 0.1 mg/l, however the federal borders are still unchanged since 1992.

Nitration pollution, led by agricultural surface flow, affects the country’s water supply. Private wells (which serve 43 million Americans) lack supervision, and families are exposed to high levels of pollution.

Nitrates disrupt the placenta function early in pregnancy, depriving fetuses of oxygen – similar to 15 percent of prenatal smoking damage. The damage often occurs before mothers realize that they are pregnant.

Experts urge an annual water test, reverse osmosis filters and renewal agriculture to reduce exposure. Critics accuse the Environmental Protection Agency of determining industry’s priorities on health, as local leaders pay strict policies.

For decades, and Environmental Protection Agency The Americans (EPA) confirmed that drinking water contains up to 10 milligrams per liter (mg/l) of the nitrate is safe. But a pioneering new study This claim breaks down.

In a study published on June 25 in Plos WaterThe researchers revealed that even the exciting quantities – which reach one percent of the limits of the Environmental Protection Agency – are associated with premature birth and children with weight loss. The authors of the study analyzed more than 350,000 birth records in the state of Iowa from 1970 to 1988, where they found undeniable damage to the long -standing levels. With the exacerbation of nitrate pollution at the country level, this study forces an account: How many generations have been at risk through old policies?

Under the leadership of Dr. Jason Simberini University monksThe study links exposure to nitrate prenatal nitrate with an increase in a percentage of 0.66 in premature births at 0.1 mg/l only-part of the EPA 10 mg/l. Worse, exposure to five mg/l raised the risk of weight loss at 0.33 percent.

These results are not isolated, as they repeated similar research from California and the risk congestion. However, federal standards remain unchanged since 1992 (relevant: Nitrate in drinking water increases the risk of colon and rectal cancer, according to the study))

The Environmental Protection Agency has never been designed to protect the growth of the fetus. It only relied on preventing “blue child syndrome”, a rare but fatal infant condition. Meanwhile, the escalating evidence indicates that nitrate disrupts the placenta function in the first month of pregnancy – often before women know they expect it.

A national crisis, not just a problem in Iowa

While agricultural surface flow in Iowa makes it a hot point, nitrate pollution extends to the United States. Industrial agricultural practices, which rely heavily on synthetic fertilizers, are poisoning from Nebraska to Texas. Study data, which ends in 1988, The nitrate levels that rise eight percent annually showed.

With no meaningful organization since then, it is possible that today’s pollution is much worse. Special wells that serve 43 million Americans are particularly weak. Unlike municipal systems, they do not face any federal supervision, leaving the open families without knowledge.

Science is clear: nitrates are starving in the development of fetuses of oxygen, such as 15 percent of the damage caused by before birth. However, while anti -smoking campaigns everywhere, nitrate risks are buried.

Early pregnancy – when the resulting organs – is the most important window. By the time the mothers seek to care for prenatal, may be damaged.

Despite decades of research, the Environmental Protection Agency has last reviewed nitrate standards in 2022 and refused to review them. Critics argue that the agency gives priority to agricultural interests on public health. Water facilities in Iowa, binding on the rules of the Environmental Protection Agency, insist that their water is “safe” – that is, the study proves otherwise.

Local leaders like the supervisor of Polik Matt Makkawi County They press for work. There may be a water quality report on charges of the defined provision on July 1 that may require tougher policies. “Nitrate in our waters has increased for nearly 40 years,” SEMPRINI expressed his regret.

Until the organizers wake up, experts urge to test water annually, especially for well -for users. Reverse osmosis filters, the only systems that have been proven to remove nitrate, is very important.

Boiling water should be avoided because it focuses on pollutants. Renewal cultivation support can also help reduce the surface flow of fertilizers.

This study is not only related to water, but is related to accountability. For 30 years, Environmental Protection Agency rejected evidence Its standards are at the most vulnerable danger. Now, with premature birth rates and fertility, the cost of failure to work cannot be denied.

Visit pollution For more similar stories.

Watch this video about Establishing a system for collecting rain water.

This video from SHTFPREPPING101 channel on Brighton.com.