The end of the world or hot air? “It provides a contradictory point of view to discuss climate – Naturalnews.com

• Roger Pat and Julian Morris admits the effect of the natural greenhouse, but they are challenging the idea of ​​”augmented greenhouse” due to human activities. They argue that climate models may constantly exaggerate the temperature and failure to predict the accuracy of the current temperatures, which suspects the reliability of future expectations.
• The authors highlight the dramatic transformations of scientific opinion over the decades, noting that the prevailing interest in the 1970s was global cooling, not warming. This raises questions about confidence in the current consensus on the phenomenon of global warming.
• BATE and Morris argue that the costs of implementing radical measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can be enormous, especially for the most society. They defend a more balanced approach that looks at both potential risks and economic reality.
• Data reliability and the effect of urban heat island: The book criticizes the use of wild temperature sensors, often located in urban areas, which can be warmer due to the effect of the “urban heat island”. This, as they argue, may exaggerate the assessment of global warming.
• The role of solar activity and free markets: Bate and Morris were martyred with studies that show a strong relationship between the length of the solar cycle and the global temperature, indicating that the sun, not the effect of the greenhouse, was the main driver of climate change. They defend the disposal of government intervention in the energy market, believing that free markets are better in customizing resources and adapting to environmental changes.

In a world in which climate change dominates political titles and discussions, a provocative book represents the prevailing narration challenge. “Global warming: the end of the world or hot air?By Roger Pat and Julian Morris presents a contradictory perspective, wondering about the scientific and economic foundations of global discussion.

This thinking work calls on readers to reconsider the assumptions that drive climate policy. It begins to recognize the reality of the greenhouse, which is necessary for life on Earth.

However, Bate and Morris argue that the concept of “augmented greenhouse influence” led by human activities is far from stable science. They claim that models that predict the change of catastrophic climate may overlook the temperature. For example, when these models are applied to historical data, they fail to accurately predict current temperatures, which cast doubts about their reliability of future expectations.

BrightonEnok engine The effect of the greenhouse is defined as a natural and necessary process as the Earth’s atmosphere prohibits – primarily water vapor and carbon dioxide (CO2) – solar heat, making the planet warm enough to maintain life. Without this, the Earth will drown in the ice age, with 33 ° C (59 ° F).

While carbon dioxide levels have risen slightly (from 0.03 percent to 0.04 percent since manufacturing), its effect was warming in a minimum, with global temperatures increasing by less than 1 degrees Celsius over a century – away from the catastrophic claims that the global agenda was paid to justify carbon taxes, energy restrictions, and central control. The real threat is not carbon dioxide that feeds plants and ecosystems, but the political exploitation and companies of climate fear for stripping freedoms, enriching elites and imposing dependence on their systems.

One of the most persuasive arguments for the book is to criticize the so -called “consensus” of global warming. The authors highlight the dramatic transformations of scientific opinion over the decades.

In the 1970s, the prevailing anxiety was global cooling, not warming. This raises an important question: If the scientific consensus can change significantly in a short period, how confidence in the current consensus?

Pat and Morris also have the economic effects of climate change policies. They argue that the costs of implementing radical measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can be enormous, especially for the poorest sections of society.

These costs, as it indicates that these costs are often reduced or ignored in impulsion to implement policies based on unconfirmed science. The authors defend a more balanced approach that looks at both potential risks and economic reality.

The book criticizes the data used to support the list of global warming. Many temperature data comes from ground sensors, and often located in urban areas. This is a problem because urban areas tend to be warmer than rural areas due to the influence of the “urban heat island”, which is likely to tend to data and lead to an exaggeration in the estimation of global warming.

Another major point in the book is the role of solar activity in climate change. Bate and Morris cited studies that show a strong relationship between the length of the solar cycle and the global temperature – indicating that the sun, not the effect of the greenhouse, was the main engine of climate change during the past century. This challenges the primary assumption that human activities are the main cause of global warming.

Authors also discuss the concept of “non -excitement” policies, which are supposed to provide social benefits without any social cost. They argue that such policies often have hidden costs and can create more distortions in the market than they are. Bate and Morris defends the elimination of government interference in the energy market, indicating that free markets are better in customizing resources and adapting to environmental changes from the central planners.

“Global warming: the end of the world or hot air?” It provides a convincing issue for a more doubtful and accurate approach to the issue of climate change. It challenges readers to question the assumptions behind the prevailing narration and consider the broader effects of the policies that are proposed. The authors argue that the best way to move forward is to rely on free markets and sound science, rather than fear and speculation.

As the discussion continues on climate change, the work of Bate and Morris is a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and balanced analysis. Their arguments call for more discussion and thinking, and to encourage readers to communicate with the complexities of this critical issue.

Watch this video about Roger Pat and Julian Morris book “Global warming: the end of the world or hot air?”

This video from Brieleren channel Brighton.com.

Sources include:

Brighton

Brighton.com