The climate judicial project is the main goal of persuading the judges to join the Ponzi scheme and persuade the world to give all their money to climate worship – Naturalnews.com

A recent open network between climate activists and judiciary has sparked major ethical and legal concerns, prompting “judicial capture” charges of critics such as Senator Ted Cruise (R-TX). The controversy focuses on Climate Judicial Project (CJP), an initiative launched in 2018 by the Institute of Environmental Law (ELI), which is not profitable to the left environment.

The CJP mission, according to its founders, is to provide judges with “objective and reliable” education in climate science and its importance for the law. But critics argue that its real goal is to influence the skill of judges who head the climate vownce.

• The climate judicial project under the scrutiny of the alleged biasA special forum on the Internet that was created by the climate judicial project (CJP) allowed direct communication between environmental activists and judges, which raises moral questions about judicial neutrality and transparency in climate -related cases.
• Ted Cruz explodes the effort as “judicial arrest”: In a hearing in the Senate, he accused Cruz CJP-which was identified by left-wing groups and alleged foreign financing-from receiving judges with selective climate data, then transferring lawsuits to those courts themselves, describing it as a “forged game” that undermines the independence of energy.
• Lists with the judges quietly hidden: Email group chat, which was launched in 2022 and made especially in May 2024, previously included 29 members and described as a “forum for judicial leaders in climate science”. Critics argue in its secrecy to undermine the confidence of the public in the judiciary.
• A wider violent reaction grows against climate activityRevelation adds fuel to the increasing general doubts, which are amplified by cultural figures such as actor Billy Bob Thornton, who condemns the “Green Energy” movement as an illusion that depends on fossil fuels that are supported by wrong information and political agendas.

The discovered chat sheds light on comfortable relations between judges, climate activists, and increasing ethical concerns

The key between concerns is a group chat in a special lists that extend from September 2022 to May 2024, allowing direct communication between CJP leaders and federal judges across the country. The documents reviewed by the Fox News Digital revealed that this forum, which once had a public visual web portal, included at least 29 participants described as “climate science leaders.” The group was suddenly made after fears began on the surface about the suitability of communication behind the scenes.

Critics, such as Senator Cruz, claim that the CJP effect represents a coordinated effort by environmental activists The form of judicial results In climate litigation. During a Senate’s hearing in June, Cruz, the group’s strategy, “Paying Players and Governance”, called for a CJP ruling to sympathize with climatic lawsuits funded by the same interests that support CJP work. He also claimed that CJP receives funding from foreign entities, including China, to manipulate the American legal system and disrupt energy dominance.

However, the climate judicial project insists that it simply provides neutral scientific information to help judges move in complex environmental cases. It denies paying any political or legal agenda.

The discussion comes at a time when doubts are increasingly on “climate alarm” and “green energy” policies. Public voices, including celebrities like Billy Bob ThorntonThey feed the reverse reaction against climate initiatives that they see as unrealistic or depend on hypocrisy on fossil fuels. In a viral scene from his new TV series LandmanThornton strongly criticizes wind turbines and solar panels, on the pretext that it depends heavily on diesel, petrochemicals and high environmental costs. Echo his remarks with part of the fabricated audience from the high energy prices and engraved elite climate regulation devices.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?

Thornton’s suspension is celebrated by the opponents of the “new green deal” and clean energy delegations, especially with a potential shift in the expected federal energy policy under a possible new Trump administration. And it emphasizes the contradictions in the climate policy, noting that most green technologies require the presence of infrastructure for fossil fuel in the first place.

Meanwhile, the disclosure of the CJP judicial network raises calls for more transparency and potential legal reforms. As environmental litigation continues, the courtesy of the courts have become a central battlefield in the broader climate discussion. With major industries, politicians and advocacy groups, the separation line between education and manipulation may soon require a lot more clear.

Payment Climatelaarmism.News To obtain updates about the mental billionaires who pay judges and “climate activists” (cultures) to pretend that the land will boil next year so that they can take all our money and control us.

Sources of this article include:

NaturalNews.com

Bezouertfund.org

CLEATEPOT.COM