Returning "Fake News" is back to return

the term “Fake newsIt has made a return to appearing recently, as politicians use this knowledge to close journalists’ questions regarding floods and scandals. While this often achieves the goal of placing the dissolved on more interrogation, how does this affect the audience?

According to 2021 review articlePeople accept the so -called fake news because “when it comes to the role of thinking, it seems that people fail to distinguish the truth from falsehood because they do not stop thinking enough about their previous (private) knowledge.”

However, people exposed “have an insufficient or inaccurate prior knowledge.”

To combat fake news, education is the key

Unlike other high reporting countries, we live in a society where it is a section education It is dismantled and command Educational positions are distributed to non -academic. As such, how can we develop sound educational policies? How can students teach discrimination:

What is true?
What is my implicit?
What is manufacturing?

Finland has an effective weapon to combat fake news: education. According to the World Economic Forum, “Nordic result is the list of European countries that are more considered flexible To mislead information, (according to) Media reading and writing indicatorThe collected by the Institute of Open Society in Sofia. Global risk report Warning that “digital forest fires” can spread wrong information quickly. “

In Finland, children are taught to identify fake news, even in daytime care.

Four problems with fake news

There are at least four arduous problems with the so -called fake news. Main problems include:

Confusion about the facts
Capacity Deception
Fabricated stories to distort the image of political opponents
Repeated to create familiarity, and thus doubt the facts

your Pio Foundation report 2017 I noticed that “the study of the Pew Research Center was conducted after it found the 2016 elections believed that 64 percent of adults believe that fake news stories caused a lot of confusion, and 23 percent said they had shared political stories fabricated by themselves – sometimes by mistake and sometimes intentionally.”

People fail to distinguish what they know about what others know. According to Stephen Sloom, a professor in the Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences at the University of Brown, it seems that an illusion of understanding “appears because people fail to distinguish between what others know about what they know themselves.” this The illusion of knowledge It can be seen as a mixture of understanding by confusing others thinking or knowing one.

To combat fake news seriously, people need intellectual curiosity, reliable sources, and the ability to be reflective.

As evidence of how the opposite people – who are less likely to illusion – think, Sloan will ask, “How many animals of each type have Moses downloaded on the astronomy?” While most people say, more people say zero. (Noah, not Moses, who built the astronomy.)

Can we put an end to the fake news?

Here are four ideas for using a chic when someone refers to fake news.

Consider the source.
Rights to verify the author or the politician.
Find reliable sources to confirm or distort reputation.
Ask yourself if your prejudices affect you.

Refusal of information as fake news undermines the free press. It is an attempt by those in power to discredit reliable news sources, which makes it difficult for the public to know what to believe.