Mercury in your hot dog? Smoothing in the vaccines face their borders at the Curcial CDC meeting

ATTANTA – Public health officials witnessed the awe, as the committee formed by the Trump administration seized an agenda to start dismantling six decades of the development of vaccination and progress.

But while the result seemed to predict, the debate was far from consensus.

The Consulting Committee for Iris -Evance Practices, or ACIP, met on the satellite campus in the centers of control and prevention of diseases because the agency’s headquarters was still shattered by a fatal rifle attack last month by a man who said the Covid vaccine had made him depressed and suicide.

The Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services, Robert F. Kennedy Junior wants the committee to change the childhood immunization schedule at the Center for Disease Control, which sometimes proves with the legal authority, which must be assigned, paid for, and managed by states, believers, and doctors throughout the country.

Kennedy launched a 17 -member committee in June and has so far returned it with 12 people, including frank vaccination critics. On September 18, the discussions of the new committee reflected its kind experience and its ignorance of how the vaccination schedule was. The scientific questions were asked decades ago as if they were completely new.

“We are the youngsters,” the biologist Martin Coldorf, head of the committee, said, noting that many technical issues that we may not understand yet. “

Paul Ofit, Director of the Checks Education Center at the Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia, watched anxiously broadcasting.

He said, “It reminds me when as children, we will hold a fake meeting for the United Nations.” “This would be like this, but we had already taken United Nations decisions.”

The Kennedy Disease Control Center has accomplished what public health attempts were for 30 years to fight the feelings of al -Qazam’s anti -action that did not have: a comparison of a face of evidence and arguments. But while the winner was clear in the eyes of most experts, some questioned that the result would be good.

“The full purpose of people in this committee is to generalize recycled old speaking points,” Sean Olieri, Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Colorado, who was previously from the American Academy of Pediatrics, told ACIP. He said that on Friday morning, a female or female colleague had a measles, mumps and descriptions, “because she heard something bad in the news about that night last night.”

To date, they dominate public health places such as ACIP, while the enemies of vaccines and skeptics have controlled social media. At this meeting, the skeptics moved to the grass in public health – where arguments and flimsy experiences were sometimes.

For example, the pharmacist Hillary Blackburn asked why children needed measles, mumps, and rubellat clips. ACIP started the recommendation with a second shot in 1989 during the deadly measles outbreak. The shot system provided more than 95 % of immunity and led to the virtual elimination of the group of the United States. This year was reported under the Trump administration more than 1,400 cases, most of them in non -imprisoned people.

In one of the Javier worthy of observation, ACIP RTSEF Levi, a professor of technology management at the Massachusetts Institute, misunderstood data from a graph showing a decrease in hepatitis B in the United States since the 1980s. Levi said that while the rates decreased in old groups, the cases in children have not decreased significantly since 2005, when he said inaccurately that the dose of childbirth was recommended for the first time.

“Where is the argument to vaccinate even young children at all,” he said. “Where is the benefit?”

In fact, the recommendation on newborns in 1991 began to be strengthened and expanded in 2005. The first generation of children with hepatitis B B is now in the 1930s.

“With the passage of time,” Adam Langer, the scientist at the Center for Disease Control, explained, “The people who have benefited from change in politics at the beginning of politics move to different age groups.”

Kulldorf, Levi and Evelyn Griffin committee member, also suggested that the vaccines should not be recommended unless they are tested in the experiments of imaginary drug, which require some children who are not vaccinated – a practice that is immoral.

Kulldorfff began the meeting with a challenge. The shooting was not mentioned at the Center for Disease Control, but former agency officials who had been Kennedy were forced to go out and challenge nine former managers at the Disease Control Center in the discussion.

He also asked whether any person from the audience was eating a hot dog that the thymeosal is wearing, a portfolio that contains mercury that the committee has seen from the influenza vaccines in Her last meeting. (No one ever presented Thimerosal as a spice, but the years of study showed that small quantities in vaccines did not harm).

At the June meeting, HHS controlled the evaluation of the Thuirosal Disease Control Center with an anti -vaccine activist to present a criticism full of errors to the material. But on September 18, the committee obtained the similar science -like sciences from the Surveillance Center for Disease Control.

With the committee’s willingness to discuss the end of the 34 -year -old ACIP recommendation for children to get a dose of hepatitis B vaccine at birth, scientists of CDC LANGER and John Su provided evidence of the safety of the vaccine and its benefits.

Langer also developed the history of hepatitis B – including failed efforts to control the disease by vaccinating people most at risk, including people who use drugs, sex workers, and pregnant women who tested the virus. Years of experience and error showed that in the United States, at least, it was necessary to vaccinate newborns to get the disease really.

Levi, who often mentions the vaccination of his six children, challenged the idea that a healthy child from the “natural” family – there is no history of drug use or prostitution – needs to vaccinate.

“The more we try to determine a targeted group of vaccination, the less successful we are. Maysner, Professor of Dartmouth College, has published studies on the vaccines and diseases they have been fighting since the 1970s.

Tropes, which has been noticed for a long time, was abundant on the first day of the meeting. Levy praised a 2004 study from Guinea -Bissau, a supernatural indicating that children, especially females, were more likely to die if they got a shot from hepatitis B. Another member of the committee said that the study, which was conducted in a poor country with an increase in infant death rate where children got an old vaccine, were not related. But more studies were needed in general. He said, “We sit here with very poor evidence.”

Nurse Vicky Pepsworth of the National vaccine information center, which opposes all the states of the vaccine, often brought her selective research at the meeting. I read the names of studies that the other team members did not receive to support their arguments that the vaccines were under discussion were not safe.

But while “a lot, very early” is a common refusal to combat Al -Qahim, Godth Shalay is from the National Association of District Health and City Health officials, which had an unspecified chair at the meeting, which he used to support the current schedule. She pointed out that the discussion of the committee on measles, mumps, rubella, and assistant children would lead to a separate snapshot of the virus that causes chickenpox, which adds to the number of vaccinations in the childhood schedule.

“Some parents want to get less injections,” she said.

With 8-3 votes at the end of the day, the committee though recommended separate vaccines from MMR and Sidoypox.

Everyone seemed confused with what happened with a vote, followed by whether the children’s vaccine program, which is pushing for more than half of the childhood vaccine, should respond to the new ACIP recommendation. The committee retracted the case on September 19.

No one can provide a clear answer about what prompted the committee’s discussion and planned voting on the dose of birth from the hepatitis B vaccine, as there was no new evidence indicating any harm from it.

Two major Kennedy assistants, both skeptics in vaccine, prompted discussion of hepatitis B on the ACIP table, according to a testimony in a Senate hearing on September 17 by former head of the Disorder Control Council, Dibra Hurai, who resigned from management policies.

ACIP Robert Malon, who claimed that flexible vaccines were dangerous, said that hepatitis B was on the agenda because he was given newborn at birth and anxiety to the newly awakened parents to the vaccine. It seemed that there was no gesture during the offer of CDC employees about the safety of hepatitis B.

The vaccination of children has always sparked parents. The poet in the nineteenth century, Alexander Hop Hume, described the evil vaccines who transformed the “pink darling” who “sieves with the elaboration” into a “fragrant infant” who “giving birth with poison”.

Malon admitted that the agenda element was not really about the feature of hepatitis B vaccine.

“The signal that provokes this is not a safety, it is one of the confidence,” he said.

But in the end, the committee reconsidated what could be the first radical step to reflect the successful American vaccination campaign. And postpone its voting on the dose of child inflammation B.