Iran Trump, Iran, transforms a reference to the change of the regime amid calls for caution and revenge – naturalnews.com

• The three American military strikes, Iranian nuclear sites, which led to warnings of escalation and regime change.
• President Trump hints to change the potential system in Tehran via social media, which represents a shift from previous statements.
• Representative Republican Thomas Massi condemns an unconstitutional bombing campaign that is unconstitutional, describing it “and not our war.
• Vice President JD Vance claims the Iranian nuclear program “for many years”, while Iran returns to revenge and warns “eternal consequences.”
• Critics link Trump tactics to the modern service that dates back to the jungle era, noting the risks of the conflict for a long time in the Middle East and bypassing the supervision of Congress.

President Donald Trump increased the United States’ tensions greatly Iran Military strikes permit on three Iranian nuclear sites, providing fears of the broader regional conflict. Less than 24 hours after blurring the B-2 blur the alleged nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and ISFAHAN, Trump alluded to changing the system in Tehran – and put his position in his initial campaign. The administration is now facing a local and international violent reaction due to the perceived transcendence, while Iran, which is already fighting Israel’s secret war, is running out of veiled threats. This clash reopens discussions on the failure of the nuclear deal during the Obama era and Trump’s departure from diplomatic standards to “protecting national security”.

Various strikes, data and rhetoric

The Pentagon confirmed the strikes on June 21, targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, which included six B-2 bombers that deploy 30,000 pounds of hidden-first-fighting bombs. Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the attacks “were largely delayed by Iranian nuclear aspirations”, while Defense Minister is a house Higseth announced the strikes “Psychological Victory”, which “covered” the nearby Iran program. However, doubts abound: Iran claims that the damage was small, as the enrichment continued despite the superficial destruction.

Trump’s axis has become clear in a social function of the fact of Veria now: “If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, then why will there be a change in the system ?? The strikes are seen as existential.

Local opposition: Representative Massi and the Constitution

Amid the escalating hostilities, Republican Congress member Thomas Massi – a liberal voice in the party – appeared as a rare critic of Trump’s worship. He condemned unauthorized strikes as “unconstitutional”, noting that the first article of the war of war in Congress. In “Face The Nation”, Massi accused the White House of “Shilling for Netanyahu”, accusing the “Israel War” under the guise of “America first”. He was pushed for the decision of the war authorities to reduce more escalation of hostility from Trump’s loyalists.

President Massi’s reprimand “La Maga” highlighted the growing cracks inside the Trump base. While many supporters of Maga chanted US military ingenuity, others see hypocrisy in a leader who campaign Against endless wars But now it reflects the tactics of the rising of the new conservatives. Critics note their parallel to the invasion of Iraq during the Bush era, with a warning of “unlimited forever war” that can destabilize the global economy and re -draw the credibility of American foreign policy.

Obama’s nuclear deal and the road to conflict

The 2015 Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran – the cornerstone of its “appeasement”, for all critics – is held a warning story. In exchange for the suspension of sanctions, Tehran agreed to reduce uranium enrichment, but critics argue that we were unilaterally. The conditions of the deal included $ 1.5 billion in cash delivered to the Iranian regime, as well as sabotaging the drug control management process targeting drug networks in Hezbollah – a betrayal of American law enforcement.

By 2025, Iran resumed the enrichment of uranium over the pre -deal levels, which resulted in the cancellation of the purpose of the agreement. Trump’s actions are now framing on the strike as a pledge of the 2018 campaign to dismantle the Iranian nuclear program “if diplomacy fails”, in contrast to Obama’s dependence on the relief of ineffective sanctions. However, historians warn that bypassing multilateral diplomacy risks the Westernization of American allies and the stiffness of Tehran’s determination.

Budget Iran dilemmas: revenge or retreat?

The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs pledged to “self -defense” in response to what it calls “violation of international law” for the United States, while its agents in Yemen and Lebanon are alluding to targeting American assets. The closure of the hormonal strait, which is the path of critical oil, is still a high -risk option. Tehran’s supreme leadership faces a bilateral option: fighting, isolation or fragmentation, or negotiating weakness and giving up regional influence.

Regional experts fear that Iran’s military revenge can rule it in an irreplaceable way. “If we do not want, the United States will strike again,” conservative analyst Reda Salhi warned. However, even the retaliatory step risk enabling militants within Tehran factions, which is likely to cut moderate sounds before they appear. Meanwhile, US officials insist that diplomacy window is still open – but the commitment to Iran “made Iran is great again” confirms deep lack of confidence in Washington’s motives.

A new era of escalation or resetting a strategy?

With the return of B-2 Bombers to Missouri, the risks cannot be higher. The Trump axis towards changing the system is a flagrant departure from Obama’s reluctant recovery, however it risks America to an expensive Middle East swamp. The skeptics cite the risks of repeating Iraq’s lessons, while supporters argue that leadership without fear alone can break Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. With the division of Congress, unconfirmed allies, and Iran’s unpredictable response, the world monitors whether this separation in relations between the United States Iran will bring accountability to the anti-anti-regime-or I ignite the conflict With no clear end point.

Sources of this article include:

Zerohedge.com

YouNews.com

nytimes.com