How wealthy elites make anger

Companies such as Crowds on Demand (COD) organize paid protests and employ actors and activists to create the illusion of popular movements for political customers or companies.

These manufactured campaigns, funded by wealthy elites, manipulated the general perception by simulating organic activity, and undermining the real democratic expression.

Previous movements, including women’s and black career, faced allegations of enlarged participation through tenant demonstrators, although the evidence often obscured by NDAS.

Billionaires such as George Soros are accused of financing “fake” active groups to form political accounts, which raises concerns about foreign intervention and elite in local issues.

Dependence on paid protests indicates that there is no support at the level of the popular base of liberal reasons, highlighting the separation between partisan correspondence and general enthusiasm.

The protests have always been a distinctive feature of American democracy, a tool for citizens to express opposition and change. But what if many of these demonstrations are not organic expressions of general feelings, but the carefully organized campaigns are funded by the wealthy elites? A growing industry, led by companies such as crowds on demand (COD), specialized in manufacturing protests, employing actors and mobilizing activists – all of this at a price. This revelation raises serious questions about the validity of modern political movements and the integrity of the American democratic process.

Work protests

Adam Swart, CEO of Al -Hasoud Company upon request, publicly announces his company’s ability Getting crowds, speakers, and even campaigns to write messages on behalf of the political reasons. His company is working as a comprehensive store for invitation groups, companies and political activists who seek to inflate their-unauthorized mission of real public support. (Related to: Senator Rand Paul says the left mob is))

SWART services include the employment of demonstrators and telephone bank employees to pressure legislators and dumping Congress offices with pre -made messages. His company website is proud to be a “nervous war pressing company and government relations”, a claim that emphasizes the activity commodity.

Astroturfing: Fake popular base, real effect

This practice, known as “asroturfing”, is widely created as there is nothing. Unlike real movements, which arise organically from general discontent, Astroturfed campaigns are transferred by deep donors who seek to manipulate political results.

Swart recently admitted that his company had offered a $ 20 million contract to help organize the July 17 protests against former President Donald TrumpCoordination by the left group, a good problem that lives on. The demonstrations, which were held on the anniversary of the death of John Lewis, were marketed as his legacy. However, Swarts rejected the deal, indicating fears that events may turn into violence.

History of manufactured movements

The idea of paid demonstrators is not new. Critics on the right have long accused liberal organizations of amplifying the number of protests with tenant activists. the 2017 Women’s march and 2020 Black Lives Matter The demonstrations faced similar allegations. Recently, the “No Kings Day” protests-which were reported to have been reported to be the largest demonstration of one day in the history of the United States-suspected of strengthening the crowds upon request, although the company denies its involvement.

Hide the identity of these operations makes it difficult to follow. COD employees sign non -disclosure and customer dramas from general audit. This secrecy allows wealthy donors to influence politics without accountability.

Soros Communication

George Soros, a billionaire financier for progressive reasons, is repeatedly linked to protest movements. Last summer, during the anti -Israel campus demonstrations, legal researcher Alan Dershitz accused Soros’s funding groups such as the Jewish voice for peace from being “fake organizations” designed for the extremism of activists.

The Soros Open Society Foundation has made millions of active networks, which raised concerns about foreign influence in local politics. While Soros defenders argue that he supports democratic values, critics see a pattern of elite manipulation – using money to manufacture the opposition rather than enhancing the real debate.

Democrats in a state of chaos?

Dependence on Astroturfing indicates a deeper problem for the Democratic Party. If the liberal reasons require the protesters paid to appear applicable, this means that there is no authentic popular enthusiasm. This despair reflects a party struggling to confront the popular energy of the Maga movement of Trump.

A Trump administration official also said, “There is nothing a party screams in turmoil more than one party that clearly lacks popular support and is forced to manipulate the political system.”

The rise of the protest industry to renting a worrying fact reveals: American democracy is increasingly displayed. Wealthy elites, non -accountable companies and political employees can now buy the appearance of general anger, distorting the national conversation. While Adam Square deserves the credit for rejecting a profitable but morally doubtful contract, His business model is still one of the symptoms of a broken system.

Watch this Video on Astroturfing.

This video from Son of the Republic Channel Brighton.com.