How to keep the fake innocent science behind bars

Many forensic techniques – including fingerprint analysis, tools analysis and a bite mark analysis – lack –

The fingerprint or deformed fingerprints can produce wrong matches, and the examiners lack uniform protocols to determine a real match as shown in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts in 2005.

The FBI admitted that hair analysis was defective in more than 95 percent of the cases that were reviewed, which led to illegal convictions such as Kirk Odom and George Perrot.

Studies indicate that forensic dentists make mistakes in determining the signs of a 63 percent bite of time, which led to illegal convictions – including the death penalty.

The continuation of these unreliable methods of regular issues – including prejudice in forensic laboratories, unjustified certainty and resistance to prosecutors and courts for reform – stems – despite the escalating donation and warnings from scientific bodies.

For decades, forensic science has been depicted as an infallible tool for justice. Fingerprints, shots and hair analysis were presented as a guide that cannot be refuted in courtrooms throughout America. However, the escalating evidence reveals a disturbing fact: many forensic techniques lack scientific verification, dependence on self -interpretation and They sent innocent people to prison.

From defective fingerprint matches to analyzing the skeptical tag, The criminal justice system continues to rely on methods that fail under scrutinyHe left thousands of illegal condemnations in their wake. One of the most obvious examples is tool analysis, as the examiners claim that lead can be a specific firearm dependent on microscopic signs.

Although the courtroom is widely used, there is no scientific study confirming that these signs are unique. In 2005, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) The comparative lead analysis (CBLA) was abandoned after the National Research Council found its conclusions exaggerated. However, CBLA -based condemnations are still undisputed.

Likewise, the burning investigations relied on the outdated myths about the patterns of burning. This has Unlawful convictions Like Victor Rosario, who spent 32 years in prison before his case in 2014.

Fingerprints, which have long been considered the golden standard for forensic evidence, are not immune to error. Partial or deformed publications can produce wrong matches, and the examiners lack uniform protocols to determine a real match.

In 2005, the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts rejected the fingerprint certificate in the Commonwealth case against Patterson, which ruled that the collection of unclear publications lacked scientific reliability. However, the country’s courts continue to accept such evidence without scrutiny.

Invisible threat to justice: fraud in forensic evidence

Perhaps the most terrible failure cases involved microscopic hair analysis, which was recognized by the FBI was defective in more than 95 percent of the cases that were reviewed. Kirk Odum and George Beirut spent contracts in prison on the basis of wrong hair matches Before the DNA is fixed to their innocence. An other practice of Mark’s bite, which was exposed, led to illegal condemnation – including death sentences – although studies that show criminal dentists determining the signs of 63 percent bite of time.

The continuation of these unreliable methods stems from systemic issues. Forensic laboratories often operate under law enforcement agencies, creating prejudice. The examiners testify to unjustified certainty, and The courts routinely recognize evidence without scientific verification.

The 2009 National Academy of Sciences report condemned the specialties of forensic medicine due to the lack of strict standards, however it has not changed much. Until the Council of Advisors in the Council in Science and Technology warned in 2016 that most areas of matching patterns lack the authority-discovery Ministry of Justice Explicit refusal.

The consequences are harsh. The innocence project states that the wrong forensic medicine contributed to nearly half of the illegal condemnation that was overturned later by the DNA. Cases such as Jimmy Genrich – who are convicted based on an uninstallized tool certificate – highlights how unwanted knowledge perpetuates injustice. (Related to: Forensic))

Despite the escalating donations, prosecutors and courts resist reform, leaving the defective techniques sent in the system. BrightonEnok refers to that The courts continue to rely on the non -minority forensic methods Because defendants often lack financial resources to employ expert witnesses who are able to expose defective work or fraudulent laboratory.

The decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the an axius engine adds that The decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the decentralized engine adds that the leventralized engine connects that the decentralized engine adds that the Eptectralized engine connect He adds that the engine is the ‘experts “and the judges in confusion between” experts of experts and cases that the engine indicates that the engine adds that “the jury is that the reduction, moreover, the forensic laboratories work with the minimum control – which allows misconduct such as fake results without discovery for years, which gives priorities for condemnation of the truth.

Until the forensology is held for strict and independent scrutiny, unlawful convictions will continue. The question remains: How many lives will be destroyed before the judicial system requires real sciences on the plays of the courtroom?

Fakescience.News He has more similar stories.

Watch this edition of “BRIGHTEON BRADCAST News” where Healger Mike Adams is displayed by Federal Forensic Medicine paid by the FBI paid.

This video from Health goalkeeper report on Brighton.com.