Eat a steak! The study shows that vegetable protein is not healthier than animal protein – naturalnews.com

You stand in the grocery path, stare in a wall of protein tapes, pea -based protein powders, plant -based burger, and beef stickers fed by grass, each one screams in conflicting health claims. Eat more plants! Go Kito! Beware of a slice of meat! For years, the narration was clear-automatic protein is a one-way ticket to an early grave, while vegetable protein is the golden child of longevity. But what if the scenario was wrong all the time?

A pioneering study published in Applied physiology, nutrition and metabolism I just dropped a bomb: the animal protein is not the evil one who led us to it. In fact, even protection against cancer may provide protection. Meanwhile, plant protein? It is not the healing medicine, it has been extracted. The research, which depends on approximately 16,000 adults in the NHANES III scanning, did not find any link between animal protein and the high risk of deaths – a sudden reverse association with cancer deaths. This is true: people who consumed animal protein were less likely to die than cancer.

This is not just another food study that was lost in noise. It is a direct challenge to the fear that pushed millions towards the exclusive diets of the plant under the guise of science. He asks a decisive question: Are we misleading through defective research, corporate interests, and cultural mania with meat devil?

Main points:

• Animal protein is not associated with a high risk of deaths, and it contradicts years of nutritional warnings.
• The high amount of animal protein was associated with a decrease in the risk of cancer, a discovery that turns the text program to traditional wisdom.
• The plant protein has shown any great preventive effect against deaths, despite the wide allegations of its superiority.
• The study used strict statistical methods to calculate long -term eating habits, and to avoid defects of defective research earlier.
• IGF-1, a growth hormone often appeared at the risk of cancer, that is, mortality-which places another portable legend.
• Organizational capture and the impact of industry may have research in the past, which gave priority to plant -based narratives on objective sciences.
• Inviced approval in diet options is crucial – this study confirms the need for transparency in food science.

Big protein deception: How bad science has formed our paintings

For more than a decade, the mantra was clear: animal protein kills. Plant protein heals. Not only did this idea of ​​delicate air-it was pushed through prominent studies, media noise, and the dining industry made with billions of dollars. The most of this reputation was a study in 2014 published in Cell metabolismWhich claimed that the consumption of high protein (especially animals) increased the risk of deaths by amazing and 400 % risk of cancer in middle -aged adults. The main author of the study, Valter Longo, became darling of the media, and its findings were sprayed through the main headlines around the world.

There was only one problem: the study was deeply defective.

The new research from the University of McMaster analyzed the NHANES data collection itself, but it used more accurate statistical methods to estimate the usual amount of protein-and not just a one-day snapshot. The 2014 study relied on one -day food recovery, which is unreliable. (Imagine judgment on a complete diet for a person based on what he ate last Tuesday.) He also collected the participants unevenly, with the category of “high protein” that contains much fewer people, which led to the deviation of results. When the McMaster team was corrected for these errors, the risk of disturbing deaths disappeared.

Why did a 2014 study got a lot of traction? Follow the money. The plant -based food industry is expected to reach $ 162 billion by 2030, and fear of meat is a strong marketing tool. Meanwhile, governmental food guidelines-which are greatly affected by pressure-compression groups-pushed vegetable meals despite weak evidence. For example, the Consultative Committee of the US Ministry’s guidelines, for example, has been criticized to ignore contradictory research while strengthening vegetable proteins as superior to their nature.

IGF-1 legend: Why does the growth hormone not spell

One of the largest tactics of fear in an anti-self-arsenal is IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1), a hormone that promotes cell growth. The claim? Animal protein wins IGF-1, which nourishes cancer. It is a convincing story – until you look at actual evidence.

The mcmaster study did not find any relationship between IGF-1 levels and deaths-from cancer, heart disease or any cause. This is in line with other research that turns out that IGF-1’s healthy relationship with health is much more complicated than “IGF-1 = high risk of cancer”. Some studies even indicate that low IGF-1 levels are associated with worse results, including weakness in the elderly.

So why is the constant fear? IGF-1 Bogeyman man has become comfortable to justify the disposal of animal foods. But science does not work. Human biology is messy. IGF-1 fluctuates based on age, activity level, general diet-not just a protein. As the new study shows, data in the real world does not support the predictions of the Day of Resurrection.

Consider this:

• Animal proteins provide complete profiles for amino acids, necessary for muscle maintenance, immune function, and metabolic health.
• Iron, B12, and Omega-3S of animal sources are more available than those in plants.
• Traditional cultures have flourished on heavy meals-from Innit to Masai-without chronic diseases that suffer from modern societies.

However, the batch to replace the meat is expensive, Plant protein powders The alternatives to super treatment are accelerated (thought behind meat, impossible burger), despite these products It is downloaded with seed oils, additives, and sodium. The same companies that benefit from these alternatives are funded by research research and food guidelines, which creates a ring of notes from wrong information.

The mcmaster study is a reminder: science must serve the public, not the interests of companies. And when it comes to your painting, you deserve the full story – not just the story that sells most vegetables. So the next time you are in this grocery path, take a deep breath. Ignore fear. And choose what suits you.

Sources include:

Medicalxpress.com

CDNSCIENCEPUB.COM

Enok, Brighton