Countries target high -end foods in pushing the two parties
California Republican James Gallagher, the former leader of the Republican Party, has often accused the state’s heavy offside, but he added his name this year to a legislative payment of more healthy school meals.
His party followed him, with everything except for one Republican voice to send a draft law to a democratic governor of Gavin New Noha, who will put him in the law a The first legal definition in the country Among the highly treated foods, followed by the ban on public schools on those who consider what is most important. While the Democrats in California were the ones who led the passage of the first prohibition at the state level Some artificial food dyes and Add -onThe state lawmakers are now conservative all over the country. “Make America healthy again.”
“We see with our children that they have no access to the best food in their schools,” said Gallaghar, a father of five players who participated in forming the last draft law with a member of the Democratic Society. Jesse Gabriel. “We see everything around us, not only in California but all over our country, that our children suffer from an obesity epidemic.”
The speed in which improving US food has become a concern for the two parties as a surprise to some health policy experts, given the criticism of the enthusiastic Republicans for such efforts in the past.
“He is baffling the mind,” said Marion Nestle, a professor at New York University who studied food and nutrition for decades. “When Michelle Obama tried to make American children healthy again, she was defamed by the right and accused of trying to overcome the role of the government, creating a nanny country, and all other types of things. Now the Republicans do so.”
Although there is no uniform definition, high -treated foods generally indicate foods that are industrially manufactured and contains ingredients that are not usually available in a home kitchen. These foods are often low in nutritional value and have high amounts of salt, sugar and unhealthy fat. Data from Disease Control and Prevention Centers indicate that more than half of the calories of Americans come from highly treated foods.
Scientific studies Tied Ultimate foods treated for poor healthIncluding an increased risk of heart attack, obesity, type 2 diabetes and mental health problems. But some of the most influential food industry groups in the country warn that the California bill, if registered in the law, can lead to foods such as burger vegetables, canned tomatoes, and shredded cheese are classified as super treatment if they contain add -ons such as egg whites, citric acid, or cornstarch.
Dennis Albiani, one of the pressure groups, said to many Industry groups. “Healthy and natural foods can be classified as a highly processed food, and this classification will just send a jam for consumers that they should avoid these healthy foods.”
At least 30 states-some of which are depth-have passed or studied restrictions on chemicals in food packaging or food, according to the Environmental Work Group, which participated in the sponsorship of the California bill. In March, Republican Governor Patrick Morrisi from Virginia Western The Trump administration thanked us for “helping us to launch this movement” when it signed legislation to ban many artificial dyes and add -ons sold in the state. In August, the Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services in the United States joined Robert F. Kennedy Junior, to Republican Governor Greg Abbott from Texas when he signed legislation to request warning stickers on foods that contain certain additions or dyes.
During, Dozens of countriesIncluding Florida, Idahu and Akllahoma, they applied to obtain exemptions from the US Department of Agriculture to prevent food stamps from buying soda, and in some cases sweets.
Kennedy, who leads the MAA movement, asked for the gradual disposal of Petroleum -based artificial foodsExplore Close an organizational vulnerability This allows chemicals to enter food supplies without the approval of the Food and Drug Administration, which is Searching for a federal definition For highly treated foods, which he says is blame for a chronic disease epidemic.
Emily Heilard, the press secretary of the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services, refused to comment on the California bill, but he said in an email that Kennedy encourages state leaders to enhance policies that give priority to children’s health, support for enlightened decisions by families, and enhance access to health options. I wondered Whether the Trump administration is serious about taking strict measures against the food industry, especially yet Mahaa’s latest reportThe released this month, it seemed to be back away from direct restrictions on pesticides and highly treated foods.
California has a mixed record in attempts to reduce what consumers eat and drink. The Democrats -controlled legislative body agreed to the ban From additions and Artificial food dyes In recent years. But in the face of opposition to the beverage industry, he was unable to ban sugary drinks of a jumbo size or tax drinks and other sugary drinks that Health service providers warning It can increase the risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and cavity. At that time, Gallaghar It is called the proposed soda ban “The type of government infiltration that people cannot stand,” but since then He said the evidence He persuaded him that additives should be removed from children’s food.
Newsom has 30 days from September 12 for signing or veto (cassation. ”Supporters of the draft law hope that the state’s regulations have a ripples in the food industry in the country, which drives manufacturers to reformulate their products. One billion meals per year.
Not all high foods that meet the definition will not be banned. Instead, the draft law guides the Ministry of Public Health in California to identify a sub -section of highly treated “disturbing” foods that must be eliminated. Management factors that must be observed include whether countries or other countries have banned food, and scientific evidence is that food causes harm or designer to be “severe”, which makes food difficult.
The Ministry of Health will have to adopt regulations that define those foods no later than 1 June 2028, and the K-12 schools will start gradually eliminating some of the highly treated foods by July 1, 2029. It is not clear how clear the costs of schools, because he does not know the foods that will be canceled, according to the analysis of the draft law.
For Jack Bobo, CEO of the UCLA Rothman Family Institute for Food Studies, the goal of the California bill is to make children’s meals more healthier, but it creates unnecessary bureaucracy. Inevitably, the highly treated foods decided by the organizers “especially harmful” will be high in salt, sugar and fat, which was created by the already existing food guidelines as unhealthy.
“People are concerned about preservatives, and they are concerned about food additives, when they should focus only on fat, salt and sugar first,” Bobo said. “It distracts our attention from the basic features that already cause the problem, or at least cause most of the problem. We have a lot of fat and a lot of sugar in our children’s meals, just as we do in adult meals.”
Bobby Mukamala, President of the American Medical Association, refused to comment on the draft law, but he said that his organization supports more governmental regulation of highly treated foods. He added that the first steps should increase public awareness of the dangers of these foods and educate people about healthy options.
Mukkamala criticized the discounts in federal financing to the National Health Institutes that he said makes it difficult for scientists to research that is known most risks foods. While a lot of highly treated food has a small nutritional value, there are some treatment methods – such as enriching pills with folic acid – which can be considered useful. And new products appear all the time.
“There is a lot of research that helps us know what is good and what is bad,” he said. The federal government says, “Let’s make us healthier by organizing these things, but let’s not do enough research to tell us what to do.” It is like one step forward and one step back. “
This article was produced by KFF Health NewsWhich is published California HealthyinIndependent editorial service for California Health Care Corporation.
Post Comment