Controversy over organ transplants and hemp

Members are a rare commodity all over the world. Every year in the United States alone, more than 100,000 people need to transplant organs to survive, but about 1 in 10 of them will get one in time. every day, 13 people on the list will die waiting. So who should get them? For what reasons we should deprive someone of the device?

The choice of a member of the members is a complex task. The United Night and Independent Organization Network honorses the transplant network and helps to determine the recommendations of large images about who must be placed in the list of transplants. However, many policies and procedures that lead to actual transplants are left even the transplant center in which they are carried out.

The one who always got one of the few members has always been a controversial topic, but recently it has become more than that with hemp’s legalization at the state level. Although hashish is illegal, it was spread throughout the country, with 40 and half -medical states allowing it to make it legal.

But this domino’s effect was not translated into organ transplant policy. As of the present time, the most state transplant center can decide not to give a person transplant only in the list due to the use of hemp, even if the condition in which they live says it can be prescribed for medical conditions. and The drug test is required for many transplants, With patients who need to show that drugs have been abstained for a period of six months.

The cultivation centers have made clear that the legal status of cannabis matters. Although 68 percent of the transplant service providers said they would allow A patient narration on the record if they use medical hempThis decreased to less than one in three (27.5 percent) to insert a patient if they use it for entertainment purposes. Some centers are explicitly prohibited to use hemp in any way.

Instructions have been suggested by many, but from now, there is no clear law. The countries have filled the gaps, where 22 states create laws to prevent hemp from being used from being the only reason for denial. But this still leaves patients in other states in a place for legal forgetfulness, allowing both hemp, but also to deny medical care because of this.

Those who deny the militant organs of cannabis users are concerned about the long -term effects of drug use on the organs. Given that the members are valuable resources, they argue that we must give them to people who have the greatest chance of success.

But supporters of bills that protect hemp users cite literature that the use of cannabis does not reduce survival rates for many organ transplants, including the liver, heart, kidneys and lung. And other concerns, including the risk of infection in cannabis users and the unwillingness to adhere to the treatments It is also borne in science.

The flag does not seem to support the idea that cannabis users are recipients for plant prejudice.

With the call reaching a temperature for official guidelines on this topic, patients remain in a state of forgetfulness, and they may be deprived of the savior of life in some states during approval in other cases. And everyone, including doctors, philosophers and neurologists, studies this charged topic.

Hemp seizure has spread throughout the country much faster than our ability to create guidelines for each moral puzzle. Patients and doctors are the ones who struggle with the consequences.