Co climb? Fuel Agriculture Victory – NaturalNews.com

• Rising Co? It has super global plant growth, which enhances fruit revenues and cold elasticity.
• Historical evidence shows temperature fluctuations associated with solar activity, not human emissions.
• IPCC Climate Climate faces doubts about defective data and selecting biased research.
• Seneonate in the global climate can be directed without measurable cooling.
• Scientists argue that CO in warming is exaggerated, as plants flourish under higher concentrations.

The high emissions of carbon dioxide, which carries long marks in the name of planetary poison, have fueled a universal “greening” of the floral areas of the Earth – and made fruit crops tougher. The results, which were analyzed alongside climate doubts, reveal a scientific and political division that reshapes the letter of climate change.

Crops flourish

A pioneering study in Nature climate change I revealed this Up to half of the Earth’s plant lands have been green since 1982, with CO? Feeling 70 % of the change. This “Greening” is equivalent to the size of the United States, which turns the landscape of strawberry fields in North Carolina to the arid heights in Iceland.

Rising Co? The levels act as “carbon fertilizers”, and super light representation in plants. In greenhouses, tomato revenues jump by 80 % at CO? It reaches 1000 ppm – a much higher level than 430 parts per million – and strawberries acquire additional sugars. Even the benefits of space exploration: high? The vitamin content is enhanced in lettuce that is planted in Mars conditions simulation.

But the gains are not only in laboratories. Global warming itself Agricultural AIDS. The extended growth seasons cut the risk of frost on the orchards, as the United States has benefited from a longer growth period for two weeks since 1910. Weak crops such as grapes and berries, which once perished in a non -seasonal freezing, are now surviving the warmer springs.

Long cold shade for the small ice age

The historical context emphasizes the crops’ fragility. During the small ice age of 550 years (1300-1850), low temperatures were suffocated. Iceland’s farms collapsed, and the orange orchards of a century of last century disappeared in Jiangshi Province, and apple trees in moderate areas with irregular flowers.

“The plants that we thought were lost in the cold, they are back, thanks to Co? And warmth. “

This cycle should be balanced natural warming, for example, balance with climate policies that focus only on curbing emissions. “Why is panic to cool 0.05 ° C by 2050 if it costs $ 10 trillion?” Climate scientist Andrew Montford argues. “You will not miss common plants? – Human prosperity may.”

Solar stain courses, not Co? Control the thermostat

Climate skeptical is the temperature? The link is backward. Solar activity, not fossil fuel, pays the Earth’s climate courses. The ice age and inter-raced from the volatile radiation from the sunlight that strikes critical latitude-a Harvard factor in the lunar Tamil diseases Martin Clark, calls “the orientation of the heavenly climate.”

You did not find the research that the peers reviewed from its geological wages William Jackson (2017) did not find any causal association between historical temperature fluctuations and CO? Levels. During the record for 425 million years, Co? Often the peak follows warming, leaving centuries. Climate specialist Edwin Perry added: “Co? It does not cause temperature – it’s only along the ride.”

IPCC asserted that 70 parts of a million from today? Perry said that the height stems only from humanity is “garbage”, citing the defective carbon cycle models. “Nature adjusts CO? It automatically flows through the oceans, soils and plants – a counter -feeding ring that humans cannot control with energy taxes.”

Tryns spend, little to show: Climate anxiety cost

the Co combat? It holds amazing shares. The United Nations estimates that the rich countries should spend 2000 annually per person by 2030 to achieve the goals of the climate -5.5 trillion worldwide-while low-income areas of 330+ billion dollars annually. After analyzing 2023 before Times times I found that US energy costs have already increased by 50 % in the states of “first renewable energy sources” such as California, where forest fires accelerated by green energy gaps now costing forests annually.

Confronting defenders that falling policies are “sacrifices for the survival of the planet.” But skeptics see a lost opportunity. Philip Energy Analyst said: “Delivery of $ 1 trillion annually on fake solar farms will not stop the hurricanes of Florida,” said Philip Energy Analyst. “Let’s invest in the isolation of floods in Miami instead of hiding from the mysterious climate chaos.”

A balanced future: science on the gentle spectrums

The discussion focuses on priorities. Urgent carbon supporters cite retail and species. The skeptical sheds light on prosperous agriculture and defective models – IOWA revenue of corn has reached record levels as a company? It rises.

“We are not against climatology“If we stop the obsession on Co?, We may finance drought -resistant crops for sub -Saharan farmers or upgrade dams in Jakarta,” said Dr. Jayraj from the alliance.

With the transformation of solar courses and its partners? Climbing levels, climate discussion simultaneously.

Sources of this article include:

Wattsupwiththat.com

amgreathing.com

Thepochtimes.com