Challenge the study of the green energy agenda in California, citing natural leaks of oils as a climate reserve – naturalnews.com

• The California study indicates that natural oil leaks contribute to methane emissions more than drilling operations.
• Oil production may reduce leakage emissions by exhausting tanks and difficult climate policies.
• More than 120,000 deserted wells can worsen, causing a discussion on environmental priorities for economic priorities.
• The researchers highlight the data gaps in measuring leakage emissions, which hinders effective organization.
• Tensions over the budget for reducing emissions, health risks and energy independence targets rise.

When environmental defenders call to end oil digging to reduce emissions, they may ignore a critical fact: the Methane problem in California may not stem from the excavators, but from nature itself. A controversial study at the University of California in Berkeley argues in this Natural oil leaks – the geological features that emit 50 times more than methane than the leakage of equipment – lead greenhouse gas emissions in the state. Professor Jimmy Riccctor team concludes that continued pits can reduce these luminous emissions, while the current regulations that give priority to the well -off bounces are exposed to unintended consequences.

Surprising solution: drilling to reduce methane emissions

For decades, activists blame oil drilling in air pollution and climate change. However, the study of the President of the University fluctuates that narration, which indicates that stopping production can increase emissions by failing to address natural leaks. More than a billion barrels of refundable oil are besieged under the terrain of southern California, which creates errors, creating paths as methane escapes through leaks.

Retor team found it Natural leaks and abandoned wells produce about 500,000 kilograms of methane per day – provided to only 10,000 of the equipment leakage. “The only way to stop leaks is by producing oil,” the university president stressed, and urged policy makers to rethink the excavation. “We increase the leakage emissions by closing the industry.”

This conclusion is in line with historical data: oil production near the coal oil point in Santa Barbara has already been canceled by venting methane from leaks within weeks of the installation of the new well. The famous La Brea Tar drilling in the region, the hot points of emissions, provides a flagrant reminder that geology in California itself is the power of fossil fuel.

Geological visions and environmental paradox

The unique Tktonian activity in California nourishes its rich ponds in hydrocarbon. The Los Angeles Basin alone, which is now home 3 million, once provided vast oil fields. The first explorers such as “smell” follow the leaks to find strikes. Today, these leaks themselves contribute to pollution, especially in low -income societies near sleeping wells.

However, Reector argues that connecting inactive wells – the axis of state policy – is not mentioned to intensify the leakage. Many old wells have been closed incorrectly, which created “human beings” that leaked methane unabated. He insists that investing in the new drilling will exhaust the tanks and provide taxable revenues, on the sharp contrast with the goal of removing carbon 2045 proposed in California.

Critics like Ira Leive from the University of California in Santa Barbara acknowledge the hypothesis of the university president, but strain data gaps. “We can not even link the exact percentage of emissions against human creatures,” Laver admitted. However, both agree that the current approach is defective, as the organizers confuse the leakage with oil field operations.

Health, environmental justice and politics a crossroads

Near societies, such as South Los Angeles, face asthma and cancer even with low oil production. Junston’s generation of the University of California in Irvin links respiratory issues and birth defects to the proximity of active wells. However, the President of the University insists on natural leaks, not holes, and pose a greater threat. “Most emissions come from hot points, leakage regardless of the excavators,” he said.

This interruption cuts the discussions about the stocks. The buffer areas that prohibit drilling near homes aim to protect the marginalized residents, but the university president warns that these measures ignore the danger. California geography is accompanied. “The policies must distinguish between the implications of industry and the role of nature,” he said.

Look forward: The search for geopolitical tensions meets

While California is wrestling with this dilemma, Federal Geologists emphasize that unexploited oil reserves can help compensate for emissions. recently American geological survey reports, the footnote 61 million barrels remain in the Los Angeles Basin – part of the previous rewards but still great. Meanwhile, pre -drilling advocates argue that the United States needs energy independence amid global instability.

Rector research, suspended, sheds light on the urgency of studying the contribution of leakage emissions. Without this clarity, California risks a costly and ineffective prohibition while real solutions – the industry that it seeks to dismantle – is ignored.

Tactonian climate crossroads in California

From the Chumash tribes that use tar as sparks to methane today, California’s relationship with its geology is fraught with risks. The university president’s study imposes a closer look at the reduction of oil drilling Really helps climate goals Or just a sin of accountability for the natural leakage effects. Since forest fires outperform the condition, the lesson is clear: the solution of emissions requires an understanding of the depths of the earth – not just closing pumping platforms.

Sources of this article include:

Zerohedge.com

Thepochtimes.com

Usgs.gov