Aluminum in mercury vaccines helps cross the blood barrier in the brain, but a new study designed to reject risk support VAX crazy worship-Naturalnews.com

Yes, people, there is another fake Danish vaccine study On books. Remember that when they falsified the numbers to make it seem that most of the polio cases were the type of marrow that has for life, so everyone will be terrified and run for a toxic vaccine? Well, they are in that again.

A very suspected study outside Denmark, published on July 15 in Annals of internal medicineHe is born with fake news addresses everywhere, claiming that he exposed any link between aluminum vaccines and chronic childhood diseases. Fake MEM MED is running with the same major addresses around the world, which condemns the clear scientific relationship between Heavy mineral toxins injection The damage to the brain and the central nervous system.

Entitled “Vaccines that absorb aluminum and chronic diseases in childhood: study of dust at the country level”He analyzed more than 1.2 million Danish children who were born from 1997 to 2018. The authors, led by Niklas Doda Anderson and the author and author Anders Hviid, concluded. There was no connection between exposure to aluminum through vaccines and risks such as autismAnd asthma and autoimmune disorders. However, a closer analysis reveals that the study was constructed in a way that is unlikely to discover the damage even if it exists.

• Compare the design of the study only children who were immunized: Danish study written by Anderson and others. Analysis of more than 1.2 million children, but the vaccination was not compared to non -immune individuals; Instead, not only children are compared to varying levels of aluminum exposure from vaccines, making it impossible to discover aluminum -related risks in relation to non -exposure.
• The main risk groups were excluded from the analysis: Children who died before the age of two, suffer from early respiratory issues, received “many” vaccines, or were diagnosed with the results of the study on an early surveys – systematically removed from the most vulnerable to damage and the study is biased towards health issues.
• An empty hypothesis integrated into the methodology: By treating the Christmas year as a variable and adjusting the diagnostic trends over time, the study has already assumed that increasing exposure to aluminum associated with the vaccine had no cause causing the increasing rates of chronic-begging to the question instead of testing it.
• Perspective healthy user results: The study has failed to control the user’s health bias, as children are unlikely to be vaccinated at risk of negative results (such as autism). The effect of this selection determines the results and helps explain how to report studies continuously of any damage – depending on the design.

How is the Danish study designed on aluminum in vaccines to find any damage

First, the ground design did not compare versus immunized children. Although more than 15,000 children in the data group did not receive any Aluminum vaccines By the age of two, researchers did not use it as a control group. Instead, the study only compared children who were all vaccinated to varying degrees – a design that limits its ability to discover whether exposure to aluminum in itself contributes to chronic disease. He asked effectively: “Does the aluminum dose increase slightly higher among children who have been vaccinated from the risks?” Instead of “children who have been vaccinated are a greater risk of non -immune children?”

Second, the authors assumed the empty hypothesis – that there is no relationship between exposure to aluminum and the disease – by treating the child’s birth year as a variable. Due to the increase in the schedule of vaccination in Denmark and exposure to aluminum over time, as well as the diagnostic rates of some diseases, which led to any possible relationship between the two.

In addition, the study excluded many children at risk of harm. The infants who died before the age of the second, as well as those who were diagnosed with the conditions of the respiratory system or any outcome before their second birthday. These exceptions may have been liquidated by the early cases caused by exposure to aluminum, The results of the bias towards the most healthy children Those who were less likely to suffer harmful effects.

The authors also excluded children with “unreasonable” numbers of vaccine doses without specifying “very much”, raising more concerns about the bias of choice and data safety.

Critics also referred to an issue A healthy user bias A well -documented phenomenon, as it is unlikely to follow the families of children with signs of early disease, the recommended vaccine schedule. This was recognized in the authors’ special references, including a study conducted by Jin and others in 2015, which found that children with older siblings who were diagnosed with autism were less likely to vaccinate. However, Anderson and others. He failed to control this founder in their analysis.

While the study is now widespread as a final evidence of the safety of the vaccine, critics argue that it was Settled designed to hide harm. It is worth noting that the study was even reported in statistical significance negative The connections between exposure to aluminum and some results – which indicates that vaccination may be preventive of chronic disease, a conclusion that some see as an unreasonable biological point of view.

In the end, the Danish study follows a familiar pattern: using selective methodology, taking biased samples, and modified assumptions to reach a pre -defined conclusion – enhances government accounts but may not reflect real health risks.

Reference Vaccines To your favorite independent websites to get updates about the experimental gene therapy injection that Big Pharma is always “safe and effective” regardless of that, but this leads to autism, early death, infertility, turbo cancer and SYNDROME.

Sources of this article include:

PandeMic.News

NaturalNews.com

Jeremyhammond.com

Acpjournals.org