A security guard at the Louvre Museum is accused of informing thieves of the theft of the $102 million Crown Jewel – NaturalNews.com
A security guard at the Louvre Museum is accused of informing thieves of the theft of the Crown Jewel worth $102 million
- The theft of a multi-million dollar jewel from the Louvre Museum was likely an inside job.
- Thieves stole eight irreplaceable French crown jewels in a seven-minute raid.
- A security guard provided inside information about the museum’s security system.
- The museum admitted there were major security failures, including a camera that was misdirected.
- It is feared that the stolen jewelry has already been dismantled and sold.
The recent multi-million-dollar Louvre heist is now being investigated as an inside operation, with evidence suggesting a security guard provided the criminals with the keys to the kingdom.
Last week, four masked men carried out a meticulously planned robbery, stealing eight irreplaceable French Crown Jewels worth approximately $102 million from the heart of Paris. The thieves’ supernatural knowledge of the museum’s security layout points directly to internal corruption, revealing how easily our cherished institutions can be hacked from the inside.
The daring robbery took just seven minutes. Using a ladder mounted on a truck, the attackers gained access to the second-floor balcony of Gallery d’Apollon, a room open to visitors at the time. They smashed a window, seized the historical jewelry, then escaped using the museum’s furniture elevator before speeding away on motorcycles. The precision of the operation, which appeared to have easily bypassed security, immediately raised suspicions that the criminals had inside information.
These suspicions have now been confirmed. According to reports, French investigators uncovered digital forensic evidence showing cooperation between a museum security guard and the thieves. A source close to the investigation said: “Sensitive information was circulated about the museum’s security, which is how they learned of the hack.” This inside knowledge allowed thieves to exploit a critical vulnerability.
The investigation revealed a series of profound security failures. The director of the Louvre Museum, Laurence de Carre, admitted before a French Senate committee that a security camera near the site of the break-in was “pointing in the wrong direction,” which she described as a “miserable failure.” The balcony they used was not under camera surveillance, a flaw that the thieves seemed to know firsthand. This inside information turned a supposedly safe national monument into an easy target.
A trail of evidence
The thieves, though well-informed, were not without faults. They left behind a trail of physical evidence, including helmets, gloves and tools. Investigators collected more than 150 DNA samples from the scene. This evidence led to the arrest of two suspects near Paris. One of them was detained at Charles de Gaulle Airport while trying to board a plane bound for Algeria, and the other was identified through DNA traces.
Despite these arrests, the investigation faces challenges. Paris Public Prosecutor Laure Bequiau condemned media leaks about the case, warning that they could “hinder the efforts of the 100 investigators mobilized.” French Interior Minister Laurent Nunez praised the police’s progress, but stressed the need to continue the investigation “in accordance with judicial confidentiality.” The priority remains in locating the stolen cultural heritage.
Fate of the jewels
There is no indication that any of the stolen Crown Jewels have been recovered. Authorities reportedly believe the pieces have already been broken up, and individual stones sold on the black market. This is a common tactic for getting rid of marked historical artifacts. The collection included a royal ruby necklace, a royal emerald pendant with matching earrings, and a diadem worn by Empress Eugenie.
The theft sparked comments from unexpected quarters. Some former jewelry thieves chimed in, expressing a mixture of professional criticism and disbelief about the security lapses. The brazen nature of the crime and apparent internal collusion shocked the public and the art world alike, raising urgent questions about who we should trust to care for our shared history.
In the aftermath, the Louvre Museum was forced to take drastic measures. The museum transferred the most valuable remaining jewels to the Bank of France for safekeeping. The fact that the stolen collection was not insured, due to high costs, increases the magnitude of the loss, both financially and culturally.
The Louvre robbery is more than just a simple robbery; It is a case study in institutional failure. The combination of internal corruption and operational incompetence allowed a piece of French history to be stolen in broad daylight.
Sources for this article include:
(Tags for translation) Chaos
Post Comment